Author Topic: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)  (Read 3270 times)

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2015, 02:18:37 AM »
Your answer to everything is the 109F.

MK84: "hey latrobe, what is the best coffee maker"?
Latrobe: "The 109F"

See :rolleyes:

Well it is! have you ever seen a 109F make coffee before!? best coffee ever!  :neener:





(seriously, fly the 109F and you'll know why it's the best  :P )

Offline Crash Orange

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2015, 03:23:36 AM »
(seriously, fly the 109F and you'll know why it's the best  :P )

I flew the 109F in the last Malta scenario and it left no doubt in my mind about why the Spit V is the best.

Offline darkzking

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2015, 03:30:10 AM »
sorry Latrobe but p39 is a far superior aircraft :devil
raynos32 Leader of the 242nd Sloppy Terminators
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10/
See Rule #4

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2015, 04:03:51 AM »
sorry Latrobe but p39 is a far superior aircraft :devil

having a bigger gun doesn't make you better!  :P

We should do some P39 fighter sweeps though.

Offline darkzking

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #19 on: January 05, 2015, 04:04:50 AM »
Latrobe next time were both on p39 fighter sweeps  :devil
raynos32 Leader of the 242nd Sloppy Terminators
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10/
See Rule #4

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #20 on: January 05, 2015, 10:23:26 AM »
Quote
109F

Love that plane.  I do get plenty of firing solutions with it.  Not as many kills proportional to most other birds.  Weird.

I mean I see plenty of hit sprites.  Just not so many leading to kills as other planes.

Does anyone else have that issue with the 109f?
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Aspen

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 692
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #21 on: January 05, 2015, 11:56:01 AM »
KI84, mainly because its the plane I know the best.  Its top speed and dive won't outrun many late war planes, but it's climb, acceleration, durability and turning ability make it a good furball survivor.

Its a good vert fighter, but plenty of planes out climb it - Spit 8, 14, 16, LA7, 109G2, G6, G14, K4, etc.  It's a great plane if you want to wade into trouble and stay engaged until you or the other guys are dead.  If you want to survive by being able to separate and reset, a faster plane would be a better choice.
AMAX  in game

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5938
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #22 on: January 05, 2015, 01:43:10 PM »
In a scenario where you have cons below you, co-alt and above you, ...

I rarely see bandits above me, as I habitually fly in what we of JG11 call the Zoneysphere.   ;)

Variants of the FW-190 tend to do fairly well up there.

YMMV


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Zoney

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6503
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #23 on: January 05, 2015, 01:49:52 PM »
I rarely see bandits above me, as I habitually fly in what we of JG11 call the Zoneysphere.   ;)

Variants of the FW-190 tend to do fairly well up there.

YMMV


 :O
Wag more, bark less.

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #24 on: January 05, 2015, 05:53:21 PM »
KI84, mainly because its the plane I know the best.  Its top speed and dive won't outrun many late war planes, but it's climb, acceleration, durability and turning ability make it a good furball survivor.

Its a good vert fighter, but plenty of planes out climb it - Spit 8, 14, 16, LA7, 109G2, G6, G14, K4, etc.  It's a great plane if you want to wade into trouble and stay engaged until you or the other guys are dead.  If you want to survive by being able to separate and reset, a faster plane would be a better choice.


 :aok

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #25 on: January 07, 2015, 12:16:10 AM »
My vote go to the Yak-3 due to its super-climb angle, manoeuvrability, and its one of the hardest fighter to down in game, its only drawback is its twin cannon (corrected in the  Yak3p model, also with a better engine).
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline darkzking

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #26 on: January 07, 2015, 01:33:48 AM »
p39, p40, hurricane mk1, ki43 all of these way better choices
raynos32 Leader of the 242nd Sloppy Terminators
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/software-download/windows10/
See Rule #4

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #27 on: January 07, 2015, 06:04:58 AM »
Quote
p39, p40, hurricane mk1, ki43 all of these way better choices

Why?
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #28 on: January 07, 2015, 07:17:37 AM »
because raynos is weird  ;)

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6441
Re: Tri-Level Cons vs. Ideal Plane(s)
« Reply #29 on: January 07, 2015, 11:12:55 AM »
The Me-410 is the obvious answer.
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."