Author Topic: Semantics Challenge!  (Read 2628 times)

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Semantics Challenge!
« on: January 20, 2015, 08:32:34 PM »
So I'm doing my notecards for API, and one of the things we're expected to define the difference between is an aircraft and an airplane. However, I think their definition of an airplane is a bit redundant. I don't mean to challenge them, of course, lol, but I thought it would be interesting to see if I could find an example proving all of the words are necessary. I'm bored lol. So, my challenge to the forums is:

Can you think of an aircraft which meets the following requirements:

-Engine driven
-Heavier than air
-Fixed Wing

But NOT:

-Supported by the dynamic reaction of airflow over it's wings.

If anyone can think of something, you guys can!

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2015, 08:36:24 PM »
VTOL?
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9170
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2015, 10:05:58 PM »
autogyro?
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2015, 11:28:53 PM »
So I'm doing my notecards for API, and one of the things we're expected to define the difference between is an aircraft and an airplane. However, I think their definition of an airplane is a bit redundant. I don't mean to challenge them, of course, lol, but I thought it would be interesting to see if I could find an example proving all of the words are necessary. I'm bored lol. So, my challenge to the forums is:

Can you think of an aircraft which meets the following requirements:

-Engine driven
-Heavier than air
-Fixed Wing

But NOT:

-Supported by the dynamic reaction of airflow over it's wings.

If anyone can think of something, you guys can!

If it's not supported by the dynamic reaction of airflow over it's wings why does it have a fixed wing?

My answer is Harrier Jet.

[EDIT]  After further consideration rocket also fits the criteria.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2015, 11:34:48 PM by BaldEagl »
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2015, 04:16:22 AM »
Lifting body aircraft.

« Last Edit: January 21, 2015, 04:18:31 AM by PR3D4TOR »
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2015, 02:48:29 PM »
Btw. Serenity, I'm not sure I understand the limitations you put on your definition, but an aircraft is any machine that can fly. Airplanes, hot air balloons, helicopters, airships etc. are all aircraft. An airplane however is a specific type of aircraft that has fixed wings, is heavier than air that is capable of sustained, powered, and controlled flight.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2015, 05:16:35 PM »
Btw. Serenity, I'm not sure I understand the limitations you put on your definition, but an aircraft is any machine that can fly. Airplanes, hot air balloons, helicopters, airships etc. are all aircraft. An airplane however is a specific type of aircraft that has fixed wings, is heavier than air that is capable of sustained, powered, and controlled flight.

The limitations I put are the textbook definition we're given, EXCEPT that the last point, about the wings supporting the weight via dynamic flow is INCLUDED as a requirement. I posted the question, because as BaldEagl noted, if the wings DON'T support the weight, why have them? That was my thought when reading it, and I was wondering if there WAS an aircraft that met all of the other requirements but that one, and thus justified putting it in words.

Those lifting bodies you put in certainly meet it, I think and I had never seen those before! The Rocket Eagl mentioned is the only other thing I can think of that might satisfy this.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2015, 07:23:24 PM »
I think the semantics problem for you is "what is a wing". An airfoil can be used for other tings than just supporting the weight of the aircraft. Like stabilizers, control surfaces, streamlined struts etc.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2015, 05:26:53 PM »
The limitations I put are the textbook definition we're given, EXCEPT that the last point, about the wings supporting the weight via dynamic flow is INCLUDED as a requirement. I posted the question, because as BaldEagl noted, if the wings DON'T support the weight, why have them? That was my thought when reading it, and I was wondering if there WAS an aircraft that met all of the other requirements but that one, and thus justified putting it in words.

Those lifting bodies you put in certainly meet it, I think and I had never seen those before! The Rocket Eagl mentioned is the only other thing I can think of that might satisfy this.

A blimp has wings to steer but not support it weight.

A helicopter can have fixed wings for both stability many have them for yaw stability, and some times partial weight support.

If you interchange the word Wing for Airfoil you may see the differences more clearly.


HiTech


Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2015, 05:31:13 PM »
A blimp has wings to steer but not support it weight.

A helicopter can have fixed wings for both stability many have them for yaw stability, and some times partial weight support.

If you interchange the word Wing for Airfoil you may see the differences more clearly.


HiTech



The problem with that is, the word wing is NOT interchangeable for us. Blimps and Helos were examples of things that cannot be considered airplanes for us. Blimps, being considered lighter than air, and helos not being fixed-wing.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2015, 05:34:59 PM »
Blimps and helicopters are not airplanes, but they are still aircraft. I don't understand what you're trying to resolve here.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Serenity

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7313
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2015, 05:43:01 PM »
Blimps and helicopters are not airplanes, but they are still aircraft. I don't understand what you're trying to resolve here.

There's nothing I'm trying to "resolve" so to speak. I was given two terms, with two definitions, Aircraft vs Airplane. The definition of airplane included both "Fixed wing" and "The weight of the aircraft is supported by dynamic pressure about the wing" (Or something to that effect) and I found myself thinking "Does there EXIST an aircraft that HAS fixed wings, but DOESN'T use dynamic pressure about the wing to support the weight of the aircraft?"

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2015, 06:40:56 PM »

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2015, 11:29:54 PM »
How about the Magnus Effect?

Like this airplane/aircraft



Edit: Magnus Effect Wiki link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

Offline Skyyr

  • persona non grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2052
Re: Semantics Challenge!
« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2015, 11:21:57 AM »
How about the Magnus Effect?

Like this airplane/aircraft

(Image removed from quote.)

Edit: Magnus Effect Wiki link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

I never knew that they made an aircraft based on the Magnus Effect. Learn something new every day! Very cool!
Skyyr

Tours:
166 - 190
198 - 204
218 - 220
286 - 287
290 - 296

nrshida: "I almost beat Skyyr after he took a 6 year break!"
A few moments later...

vs Shane: 30-11

KOTH Wins: 6, Egos Broken: 1000+

Mmmmm... tears.