Fuel Reduction to 50% or lower for Base Attacks

[Volron]

If you are talking about the 109, keep in mind that it has a tiny fuel tank. Range was the 109s most glaring shortcoming during the BoB. Compare that with the P-47N that carries more than 5 times the fuel load of the 109 and was supposed to be able to cover 2000 miles sorties. Even with the scaled up Fuel Burn Multiplier of the MA, the distance between fields in very short for so much fuel.

All fighters.   It's rare for me to take less than 100% in any fighter.

[FBKampfer]

All fighters.   It's rare for me to take less than 100% in any fighter.

But... Why? 200 gallons of fuel isn't insignificant in weight.

[hgtonyvi]

Do not limit fuel at all. Both percentage and absolute amounts make very little sense with respect to real life. In R/L it is either you get the fuel you need or you do not fly. With respect to the game, each method affect different kind of planes differently - neither is fair.

Limiting fuel does not accomplish anything gamewise. Just forget about it. If you want to disable planes - kill the hangars.

I agree with this methods. I was gonna say the same thing Bozon.....

[Volron]

But... Why? 200 gallons of fuel isn't insignificant in weight.

I mentioned my reason in an earlier post.