Author Topic: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH  (Read 21694 times)

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4276
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #30 on: June 23, 2015, 05:29:49 AM »
I had suggested before that eny calculation be partially tied to ww2 actual usage but the "Don't tell me what to fly." people had a field day with that one.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #31 on: June 23, 2015, 08:38:53 AM »
I'm not surprised they didn't want a little Napoleon limiting their use of a game.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4276
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #32 on: June 23, 2015, 08:43:39 AM »
It really gets down to the balance of a game and simulation.  Very touchy as you can see.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #33 on: June 23, 2015, 09:33:09 AM »
WWII actual usage has nothing to do with balancing a game. AH is not a WWII simulator. It's air-quake with WWII equipment.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23922
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #34 on: June 23, 2015, 10:02:30 AM »
If AH wanted to reflect actual WWII usage the Ostwind would have a perk price going through the roof  :old:
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4276
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #35 on: June 23, 2015, 10:11:04 AM »
If AH wanted to reflect actual WWII usage the Ostwind would have a perk price going through the roof  :old:

Looking at the statistics for this tour, I am not sure many people would care.

WWII actual usage has nothing to do with balancing a game. AH is not a WWII simulator. It's air-quake with WWII equipment.

Per HTC, "Aces High is a massive multi-player online combat simulation centered around the World War II air-war."

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #36 on: June 23, 2015, 10:25:00 AM »
Oh? Who won WWII then, bish, rook or knit?
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #37 on: June 23, 2015, 10:30:49 AM »
... also is exactly what aces high main arena play does, it tries to accurately produce a simulation of WWII equipment. And does not try to simulate wwii. WWII was already been fought. We simply make a game that use wwii equipment.

As I have stated many times. A game is meant to be fun and fair, war is neither.


HiTech
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline DmonSlyr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6896
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #38 on: June 23, 2015, 10:49:53 AM »
F4u1C will out turn the La7 all day.

The la7 does have speed and accel advantage.

If La7 starts with E advantage, it's a tough bird to fight for any airplane in the game.

The F4u1c, like predator said, has the ord, fuel, and better guns than the La7. However, I think the La7 is much more versatile at low alts, getting away from gangs of enemies, and can gain steam a lot more quickly than the F4u1c.

The F4u1c is a great plane to fight against cons that are lower than you. But in a furball Vs 190Ds, P51s, and La7s, you aren't going to have much fun against a good BnZer.

If only the F4U1c was a little bit quicker off the gun it would greatly help it, but it takes a lot of patients to fly a Chog, Slow climb, Slow Accel. VS a plane that takes 0 Patients like the La7 that can get to high alt quickly and excel very quickly. It is almost 2 different fighting styles. The F4U is a great BnZ plane and Great turner, But you cannot do them both well at the same time. Whereas the LA7 is more like a 109 where you can be both a BnZer and turner at the same time and for the most part, get away with it, and even be able to escape (extend away) from multiple planes, you cannot do that in a Chog without fighting your way out.
The Damned(est. 1988)
-=Army of Muppets=-
2014 & 2018 KoTH ToC Champion

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #39 on: June 23, 2015, 11:01:05 AM »
I like that. Yes the La7 is like a low-alt 109. Not quite the same climb/accel, but makes up for it in top end speed.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #40 on: June 23, 2015, 11:57:58 AM »
I had suggested before that eny calculation be partially tied to ww2 actual usage but the "Don't tell me what to fly." people had a field day with that one.
The problem is that is such an arbitrary factor.

Heavy limits on Ta152s, F4U-1Cs, Spitfire Mk IXs (only ~300 Merlin 61 versions like ours were built), C.205s and B.239s while essentially no limits on P-51Ds, Spitfire Mk XVIs and La-7s.

Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline TonyJoey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #41 on: June 24, 2015, 10:02:27 AM »
Just my 2 cents, but give me the C-hog every time against an LA 1v1, if only because I will happily light you up with my 4 hizookas as you try to BnZ. From a pure flying perspective, the LA has the nod I think, with a few trade-offs, but throw in probably the most deadly gun package in the game, and the C-hog becomes a flying deathstar that can point its nose anywhere quickly and shred anything in its sights relatively easily.

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #42 on: June 24, 2015, 01:47:31 PM »
Just my 2 cents, but give me the C-hog every time against an LA 1v1, if only because I will happily light you up with my 4 hizookas as you try to BnZ. From a pure flying perspective, the LA has the nod I think, with a few trade-offs, but throw in probably the most deadly gun package in the game, and the C-hog becomes a flying deathstar that can point its nose anywhere quickly and shred anything in its sights relatively easily.
Yes, the C-Hog is 4 hispanos with some kind of a plane holding them together :)
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #43 on: July 05, 2015, 06:19:51 AM »
The C-hog is not even close to the Me-410 in guns with its 2*MK103 and 2*20mms, not only does it easy out range the
Hispanos, one hit and destruction of  any fighter  is ensured (each round inflicting 2x damage compared with a mk108 of the 109k).

Just my 2 cents, but give me the C-hog every time against an LA 1v1, if only because I will happily light you up with my 4 hizookas as you try to BnZ. From a pure flying perspective, the LA has the nod I think, with a few trade-offs, but throw in probably the most deadly gun package in the game, and the C-hog becomes a flying deathstar that can point its nose anywhere quickly and shred anything in its sights relatively easily.
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: LA7 Usage: WWII vs. AH
« Reply #44 on: July 05, 2015, 09:31:02 AM »
The C-hog is not even close to the Me-410 in guns with its 2*MK103 and 2*20mms, not only does it easy out range the
Hispanos, one hit and destruction of  any fighter  is ensured (each round inflicting 2x damage compared with a mk108 of the 109k).

Hitting power is only part of the equation. The Hispanos are nearly as point-and-click as the Browning .50cal, and have double the rate of fire of the 103. It's much easier to get rounds on target with the Hispanos.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.