http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/02/congress-surveillance-reform-edward-snowden
i came across this link from June 2015 when reading about Edward Snowden but I was not certain of exactly what this new "USA Freedom Act" entailed... obviously anything named like this like the patriot act was named raises red flags right away.
eagl you seem to know more about this... did Snowden actually accomplish anything with his disclosure and ensuing public outrage or is it status quo of monitor everything record all digital traffic over all the united states and the world at all times like they have been doing?
I think that people who have power are loath to give it up, and governmental agencies who are created with the express purpose to wield power "in the name of the people, for the people, whether they like it or not", are equally resistant to stopping their activities. Ruby Ridge and Waco highlighted huge abuses of power by federal law enforcement, and the only thing that changed is when they tried it with that dude in Nevada, a few hundred citizen patriots showed up to make damn sure he and his family didn't die right there with no witnesses but the feds who looked ready and willing to do him in. The agency is still there, and it still uses the same tactics.
No, the President, congress, and the "experts" who have been given these sweeping powers will never give them up willingly. Even President Obama who campaigned on a platform that included the explicitly stated intent of reducing the size of the military, closing gitmo, etc., ended up doing the exact opposite once he was the one directing those activities. That kind of power does not go away by itself once it has been given to the government. Worse, the bureaucrats in charge of writing and implementing policy are NOT ELECTED, so they answer to nobody but their own non-elected supervisors. Political appointees who head those organizations come and go every couple of years, so the bureaucracies can easily wait them out and continue doing what they've been doing. Nobody in government willingly gives up power once they have it, even those who actively campaigned on a platform of reducing *whatever* government power they vilified to gain votes.