Necessary or not, and I don't necessarily agree, it's still tragic. We should treat it and view it as such.
I'm not sure how the two are mutually exclusive. For that matter, most mature individuals respect the sacrifices of those who volunteer to do so in order that others do not have to endure those hardships. Perhaps there are some who misunderstand that respect for hero worship and thus we have threads like this one.
Last year an estimated 55,000 people died because of the war in Syria. The bloodiest war in a long time. So far today 113,000 people have died from all causes. So far this year 17,000,000 people have died from all causes. Every single of those deaths is a tragedy to someone. You need some perspective.
Estimated deaths in the Syrian war is now close to 500.000 with around 90% killed by the regime...
But then you have to completely ignore the suffering of other people caused by these soldiers , in this case is Russia helping Assad bombing the crap out of his people because they were rude enough to demand democracy.
But I guess the suffering of the Syrian people is irrelevant..
Not so relevant to compare wars and car accidents as there are few states or organizations that kills people on the roads to achieve a political goal...
That said, if given the choice I'd choose war over cancer every time.
1) Who are "these soldiers"? 2) There is a ongoing power struggle between many factions in Syria. Only a small sub set of them are "rude enough to demand democracy"Seriously? What kind of childish remark is this?
Then i would say that you have no idea of what you are talking about.