Author Topic: Scenario statistics  (Read 879 times)

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Scenario statistics
« on: July 02, 2016, 02:51:58 AM »
As of today:




Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Scenario statistics
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2016, 02:54:51 AM »
Scenario dates:

    The Battle of the Dnieper (June, 2016
    Southern Conquest (February, 2016
    Target for Today (May, 2015
    Battle Over the Winter Line (January, 2015
    The Pacific War (June, 2014
    Battle of Britain 2013 (September, 2013
    Mediterranean Maelstrom (March, 2013
    Der Grosse Schlag II (October, 2012
    Winter Sky - Death Ground (April, 2012
    Enemy Coast Ahead (October, 2011
    Road to Rangoon (May, 2011
    Battle Over Germany (February, 2011
    Philippine Phandango (August, 2010
    The Final Battle (March, 2010
    Red Storm / Krupp Steel (October, 2009
    Coral Sea 2009 (July, 2009
    Tunisia: Dawn of Battle (April, 2009
    Battle of Britain 2008 (November, 2008
    Rangoon, '42 (2008) (August, 2008
    Der Grosse Schlag (October, 2007
    Operation Husky (June, 2007
    Battle of Britain 2006 (September, 2006
    Operation Downfall (July, 2006
    Stalin's Fourth (April, 2006
    Fire Over Malta (November, 2005
    Coral Sea (April, 2005
    Rangoon, '42 (October, 2004
    Battle of Britain 2004 (August, 2004

Offline Kanth

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2462
Re: Scenario statistics
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2016, 07:17:06 AM »
it does make me wonder what happened during that one  :rofl   overall successful.
Gone from the game. Please see Spikes or Nefarious for any Ahevents.net admin needs.

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15670
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Scenario statistics
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2016, 07:18:39 AM »
I thought that one was excellent  :devil
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Scenario statistics
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2016, 08:59:54 PM »
it does make me wonder what happened during that one  :rofl   overall successful.

Asymmetric scenarios (such as where one side has bombers and the other doesn't) are much more difficult to balance than symmetric ones (where each side has the same number of the same types of aircraft and similar objectives).

In Mediterranean Maelstrom, bombers rarely made it to target, and axis was usually enough out of lives by the end to be heavily outnumbered.

I think that could be easily remedied just by reducing number of fighters on allied side and adding a couple of bombers to the axis side.

Offline Kanth

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2462
Re: Scenario statistics
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2016, 03:10:59 PM »
it's too bad there isn't a way to do that more on the fly before it gets really ugly without upending everyone in their assigned groups.
I guess walkons like we did is the best that can be done.
Gone from the game. Please see Spikes or Nefarious for any Ahevents.net admin needs.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Scenario statistics
« Reply #6 on: August 08, 2016, 11:30:01 PM »
A terrain map showing playing area for various scenarios along with average players in a frame (in parenthesis):

« Last Edit: August 08, 2016, 11:31:56 PM by Brooke »