Control of a destroyer

[68EZPkns]

The new Fletcher class destroyer looks great,just wish we could control one like a PT boat. And is there any plans to add LST's so we can do amphib landings? Would also like to see the Atlanta class light cruiser. Was a AAA cruiser with lots of rapid fire 5 inchers.

[BowHTR]

Have you sen the new Iowa class?

[Skyguns MKII]

Sumner class 

[Ramesis]

Jeez... that is all the game needs.. some one
grabbing a destroyer (a shade for example) and
removing it from what it was intended to do... picket around a CV
Ram
 

[Hungry]

Jeez... that is all the game needs.. some one
grabbing a destroyer (a shade for example) and
removing it from what it was intended to do... picket around a CV
Ram
 

A destroyer vs destroyer battle wouldn't be cool and add to the game? you cant stop the goofballs but you cant let them stop progress either.

[LCADolby]

I like the idea, but not from a CV group. Perhaps from a Port you could go out to sea in it. Additionally this could be with other ships and subs/U-boats.

[Volron]

Agreed.  The DD shouldn't come from one of the TG ships.  Spawning one in at the TG, maybe.  Can add a "hanger" at ports for DD spawning, only in this case it's a dry dock.

Jeez... that is all the game needs.. some one
grabbing a destroyer (a shade for example) and
removing it from what it was intended to do... picket around a CV
Ram
 

IF they were to allow for it (which I very much doubt), just make it to where it will announce when a player takes a DD from the TG's set, much like how it's announced when someone changes a TG's course.

[KiLrGrampa]

  Yes! What Volron said!

[EskimoJoe]

Agreed.  The DD shouldn't come from one of the TG ships.  Spawning one in at the TG, maybe.  Can add a "hanger" at ports for DD spawning, only in this case it's a dry dock.

IF they were to allow for it (which I very much doubt), just make it to where it will announce when a player takes a DD from the TG's set, much like how it's announced when someone changes a TG's course.

I feel like if we have DD's guarding the fleet, then keep them there. Maybe smaller ships for players, up to frigates or something. I feel like DDs manned by a crew as they are are good, but if we're going to give players the sole ability to spawn ships and single-crew them, they should be smaller ships that need to coordinate with other players to take down a fleet.

My .02

[Randall172]

When are we gonna get the Yamato Battleships

[Hungry]

lol always conditions, seems like around here 2 cents is more like $100.00, break out some destroyers, let us get a few folks to man the guns and let us shoot at each other swerving around, or let us attack and or defend the carrier. 

Paralysis by analysis is what's its really called no wonder the game takes so long to modernize.

[bustr]

While testing the Iowa class battleship it candle sticked exactly like the CV does. I've incorporated one into the three task forces in my AH3 gunnery training terrain. The main gun battery will take down the CV in three salvos while the reload time is about 30 seconds.

I suspect when it is released in it's finished presentation with AH3 live, I will have to remove it from the three CV task forces and update the terrain with one or two battleship task forces. I'm just guessing here because the battleship candle sticked exactly like the CV.

The destroyers look spiffy along side the new updated CV and battleship skins.     

[EskimoJoe]

Paralysis by analysis is what's its really called no wonder the game takes so long to modernize.

If the game was updated by what the players wanted, it would be dead like Air Warrior 20 years ago.

[LCADolby]

If the game was updated by what the players wanted, it would be dead like Air Warrior 20 years ago.

Considering how the numbers are now, it could be said that in it's current state it isn't what the players want.

[Lusche]

If the game was updated by what the players wanted, it would be dead like Air Warrior 20 years ago.

The players had no part in the death of Air Warrior.