Author Topic: What should the February Scenario be?  (Read 11761 times)

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #60 on: October 27, 2016, 04:21:02 PM »
That's probably just your head position and wide FOV in-game. In the 109 I've moved the head position forward to get a more correct view, but with the high FOV I use it is impossible to get it totally right.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Molsman

  • Aces High CM Retired
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5339
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #61 on: October 27, 2016, 07:09:57 PM »

would BOG be out of the Question for a 12 hr event???
JG11, DerWanderZirkus, -The Flying Clowns-
               Wait n Bleed

Offline swareiam

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #62 on: October 27, 2016, 07:17:18 PM »
would BOG be out of the Question for a 12 hr event???

Dude,

Sounds like a taker. I think that is the only scenario I have missed since 2008.
AKWarHwk of the Arabian Knights
Aces High Scenario, FSO, and Combat Challenge Teams
Don't let your ego get too close to your position, so that if your position gets shot down, your ego doesn't go with it. General Colin Powell

Offline Molsman

  • Aces High CM Retired
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5339
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #63 on: October 27, 2016, 07:22:15 PM »
Was the 2nd Scenario I flew in since coming back I think the first one I flew in was was Philippine Phandango or something like that. But the most I recall about BOG was the even matched planes and the great fights that came with the event I could be wrong but I think there were alot of Great remarks plus some bad like always  about that Scenario and the Turn out was pretty good but then again I could be wrong, just sitting here and thinking of what Hit Scenarios with good turn outs would be good for 12 hr events and this seems to the new trend of going to 12 hrs easier for alot of us to get off from work to play the events then 4 Saturdays of trying to get off from work.
JG11, DerWanderZirkus, -The Flying Clowns-
               Wait n Bleed

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #64 on: October 27, 2016, 11:15:22 PM »
Anybody around from the AW team?  They canned some interesting scenarios back in the day.  It's possible that a list of their work would throw out some new ideas.
I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #65 on: October 27, 2016, 11:43:45 PM »
Quote
Anybody around from the AW team?

Brooke and I at least.
ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #66 on: October 28, 2016, 02:17:33 AM »
Jordi used to be in that group and Tilt?  You must have some docs laying about somewhere or a few shadowy memories at any rate.
I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #67 on: October 28, 2016, 04:30:38 AM »
Anybody around from the AW team?  They canned some interesting scenarios back in the day.  It's possible that a list of their work would throw out some new ideas.

Yes.  I started a group that did them in the later 1990's.  It's been so long, I don't think I have any info left on the designs.  Some might exist online somewhere for all I know.

A list of them going back to the first one in 1993 are here, along with pictorials from the few most-recent ones:
http://electraforge.com/brooke/flightsims/scenarios/scenarios.html

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #68 on: October 28, 2016, 05:02:59 PM »
I was part of the Catch-22 crowd that did Ploesti, Italy and a couple others.

The Ploesti "Those who Fall" was the one that brought us the infamous "I Call Bull#^*t" whine 😀

That was a side switch that included a low level Ploesti run, the all P-38 Ploesti raid anc a normal bombing raid where you had to run them but the CO decided which frame they wanted to do them.  Seems like I recall 6 frames with each side flying 3 Allied and 3 Axis
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline puller

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2210
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #69 on: October 28, 2016, 05:30:05 PM »
I'm ready to start voting on the theater...then we can work on design  :noid
"The road to Hell is paved with good intentions."
CO   Anti-Horde

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #70 on: October 28, 2016, 06:19:57 PM »
Jordi, Tilt, Flossy, ya shadow memory has them lurking.  I think Culero is still around but not in game, I seem to remember asw being on there, maybe Hajo?  I am going to have to really search, I know there are a lot.

Oh, here is an scenario standard DoK drafted way back when


http://www.gonzoville.com/DoK/AW/scenarios/scenario_rules.html

ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline mthrockmor

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #71 on: October 28, 2016, 06:36:22 PM »
In priority....
#17, 16, 9 and 11.

Boo
No poor dumb bastard wins a war by dying for his country, he wins by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
George "Blood n Guts" Patton

Offline Chris79

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #72 on: October 28, 2016, 07:38:48 PM »
10,1,11,16


Chuikov

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15570
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #73 on: October 29, 2016, 02:08:58 AM »
By the way, folks, we're not tallying votes yet.

First, folks can discuss and develop any additional suggestions.

Once it's time to open the vote, I'll start a new topic for it.

Offline branch37

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1831
      • VF-17 Jolly Rogers
Re: What should the February Scenario be?
« Reply #74 on: October 30, 2016, 10:05:50 PM »
I think if you take a late '43 setup and skew the plane set a little.  Add more Ki-61s, it would balance out the P-38s and F4Us.  The Ki-61 is more than a match for the F4U-1 or -1A.  My vote is still for solomons late '43.

CMDR Branch37
VF-17 Jolly Rogers  C.O.