Author Topic: Variants of existing planes  (Read 5567 times)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #90 on: November 22, 2016, 06:56:55 PM »
Can you remind me where the H fits in terms of differences between the G and J? My problem is that the differences are so minimal after a certain point on P-38 variants that you can just add weapons options to an existing plane. What sets the H apart?

P-38H had more powerful engines (1425 hp Allison V-1710-89/91 engines) than the G.  The P-38H was fitted with automatic oil radiator flaps in order to solve a chronic engine overheating problem and enable military power above 25,000 feet to be increased from 1150 to 1240 hp.  The M1 20mm cannon was replaced by the more reliable M-2C 20mm cannon and bomb capacity for each underwing rack was raised to 1600 pounds.  It also introduced WEP, as previous versions of the P-38 lacked WEP.
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #91 on: November 23, 2016, 11:40:49 PM »
Mosquito F.Mk II
Mosquito B.Mk IV
Mosquito FB.Mk XVIII
Mosquito NF.Mk 30

Ju88C-6
Ju88G-6

B-17F

LaGG-3
La-5
Yak-1

B-24D

Ki-61-I

P-51A

Seafire Mk III

Bf109G-6/AS

C.200

P-38H
« Last Edit: November 23, 2016, 11:42:33 PM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Online Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9002
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #92 on: November 24, 2016, 12:03:20 AM »
Bf 110F
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #93 on: November 24, 2016, 05:48:54 AM »
The Fw 190 A-9 for sure had a more powerful engine, that's what made it different from the A-8. Both were produced simultaneously due to lower availability of the stronger engines. By the end of November 1944 the A-9 delivery count was at 215 and the A-9/R11 at 185. Some ~250 more of both until 2/45. It's not known how many were produced afterwards, it may be possible they focussed on the F-9 ground attack version with the same engine instead as the Jumo-engined D-9 proved to be the better fighter.

Offline shotgunneeley

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1051
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #94 on: November 25, 2016, 09:37:06 AM »
I want the B-17F model in a hurry - mostly so i can get the "Miss Ouachita" skin (of local significance to Arkansas).
"Lord, let us feel pity for Private Jenkins, and sorrow for ourselves, and all the angel warriors that fall. Let us fear death, but let it not live within us. Protect us, O Lord, and be merciful unto us. Amen"-from FALLEN ANGELS by Walter Dean Myers

Game ID: ShtGn (Inactive), Squad: 91st BG

Offline FBKampfer

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 642
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #95 on: November 27, 2016, 05:36:07 PM »
From everything I can find, it really seems like the early US bombers are kind of unneeded, even from a scenario standpoint. Frontal attacks are exceedingly rare in the MA, and typically a one-shot deal in special events from what I've seen. And major variants we would like be likely to get would mostly have the same tail and belly armament.
AvA Development Group
Freebird SAC member

Great men are forged in fire; it is the privilege of lesser men to light the flames.

Offline ccvi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2074
      • http://www.carl-eike-hofmeister.de/
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #96 on: November 29, 2016, 07:08:07 PM »
Speaking of the P-38, wikipedia lists some interesting options for the -L.

Apart from the 2000 lbs bombs, and the large number of 500 lbs bombs, the most interesting option being the troop pods.

"Standard Lightnings were used as crew and cargo transports in the South Pacific. They were fitted with pods attached to the underwing pylons, replacing drop tanks or bombs, that could carry a single passenger in a lying-down position, or cargo. This was a very uncomfortable way to fly. Some of the pods were not even fitted with a window to let the passenger see out or bring in light." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning)

Surely, someone added this to wikipedia as an april fools joke?

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #97 on: November 29, 2016, 09:19:22 PM »
Speaking of the P-38, wikipedia lists some interesting options for the -L.

Apart from the 2000 lbs bombs, and the large number of 500 lbs bombs, the most interesting option being the troop pods.

"Standard Lightnings were used as crew and cargo transports in the South Pacific. They were fitted with pods attached to the underwing pylons, replacing drop tanks or bombs, that could carry a single passenger in a lying-down position, or cargo. This was a very uncomfortable way to fly. Some of the pods were not even fitted with a window to let the passenger see out or bring in light." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning)

Surely, someone added this to wikipedia as an april fools joke?

"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline JimmyC

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5196
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #98 on: December 01, 2016, 03:08:17 PM »
Brits had it covered....
CO 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #99 on: December 06, 2016, 07:41:48 AM »
That's just a new way to deliver cybro to a base  :cool:

Speaking of the P-38, wikipedia lists some interesting options for the -L.

"Standard Lightnings were used as crew and cargo transports in the South Pacific. They were fitted with pods attached to the underwing pylons, replacing drop tanks or bombs, that could carry a single passenger in a lying-down position, or cargo. This was a very uncomfortable way to fly. Some of the pods were not even fitted with a window to let the passenger see out or bring in light." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_P-38_Lightning)

Surely, someone added this to wikipedia as an april fools joke?
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline Owlblink

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #100 on: December 08, 2016, 09:23:46 PM »
Sorry, somehow made a miss post on my phone :bolt:
« Last Edit: December 08, 2016, 09:28:47 PM by Owlblink »
Kommando Nowotny FSO
80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #101 on: December 10, 2016, 09:42:01 AM »
That's just a new way to deliver cybro to a base  :cool:

Is cybro RuPaUl's shade?  They have the same alternating type fetish.
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."

Offline FLOOB

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3054
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #102 on: December 11, 2016, 07:06:50 PM »
variants of planes of existance
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans” - John Steinbeck

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #103 on: December 14, 2016, 02:34:56 PM »
The A9 did have the TS engine, the F-engine however never enter service, it was a 30mm longer version of the A8 (The current A8 airframe can be reused, maybe with the exception of the canopy that was the same as the F8)

The A-9 used both the new wood paddle propeller, and the metal propeller.

The TS engine had 1,471 kW instead of the BMW 801 D-2 that had 1,250 kW the A7-A8 had.
The BMW F-1-engine had 1,765 kW.

Source :  FW190 volume 3 1944-1945 

The 190 A-9 didn't have an engine any stronger than the A-8. The myth of the A-9 having a more powerful engine never really materialized.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 02:43:22 PM by save »
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Variants of existing planes
« Reply #104 on: December 15, 2016, 03:05:54 PM »
Maybe as an early Christmas present Hitech could let Waffle list what is on his work list for updating the old 3D models and any new rides for the first quarter of 2017. Strangely, over the years asking politely has often been answered with something.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.