Author Topic: Radial vs. Inline  (Read 10759 times)

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8726
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #30 on: May 22, 2017, 07:31:50 AM »
That is just the crank case, like in the picture I've already posted.

Yeah, that was sort of my point.


The cylinder banks are cast and machined as separate parts, unlike in a typical car engine.

Yes thank you, I am familiar with the Merlin engine. Also motorcycle and car engines. Have rebuilt quite a few of those which I found to be of an identical architectural approach to the Merlin. Even at 22:10.

Perhaps if you consistently used accepted terminology we could all get a handle on the differences in production you are claiming. Are you under the illusion that the barrels and heads are typically one piece? Are you talking about cylinder liners versus Nikasil / Alusil, for example?

"Skyyr squealed with glee like a teenager watching that guy get mad while Skyyr shade griefed him for days on end." - Vraciu,
August 28, 2014 0:42:01 PM

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8726
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #31 on: May 22, 2017, 07:35:00 AM »
Typical car engine block.

I think I see what you're driving at, that the crankcase and barrels are one piece? This isn't actually historically very typical.

"Skyyr squealed with glee like a teenager watching that guy get mad while Skyyr shade griefed him for days on end." - Vraciu,
August 28, 2014 0:42:01 PM

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #32 on: May 22, 2017, 07:43:41 AM »
I think I see what you're driving at, that the crankcase and barrels are one piece? This isn't actually historically very typical.

For American car engines it is.


Are you doing ok Shida? Arguing over semantics in a two month old thread doesn't seem like you.



"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #33 on: May 22, 2017, 07:51:44 AM »
Perhaps if you consistently used accepted terminology we could all get a handle on the differences in production you are claiming. Are you under the illusion that the barrels and heads are typically one piece? Are you talking about cylinder liners versus Nikasil / Alusil, for example?

No. Cylinders and heads are usually not in one piece (lol). Cylinders and crank case usually are.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8726
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #34 on: May 22, 2017, 07:53:30 AM »
Are you doing ok Shida? Arguing over semantics in a two month old thread doesn't seem like you.

I didn't bump it  :old:

I was just confused / intrigued by the 'unlike in car engines in inline aero engines the cylinders and crank case are not just drilled out of a block of metal' comment. Would love to have seen a car engine drilled out if a block of metal. In fact your picture came pretty close  :rofl


"Skyyr squealed with glee like a teenager watching that guy get mad while Skyyr shade griefed him for days on end." - Vraciu,
August 28, 2014 0:42:01 PM

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8726
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #35 on: May 22, 2017, 07:55:27 AM »
No. Cylinders and heads are usually not in one piece (lol).

There have been some believe it or not!


Cylinders and crank case usually are.

I think we'll have to agree to differ on the definition of usually.  :salute

"Skyyr squealed with glee like a teenager watching that guy get mad while Skyyr shade griefed him for days on end." - Vraciu,
August 28, 2014 0:42:01 PM

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2017, 08:03:26 AM »
The Americans have been making engines like that for the better part of a century. Heavy and inefficient, but bulletproof... Which is a good thing in America.  :D
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8726
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2017, 08:07:46 AM »
The Americans have been making engines like that for the better part of a century. Heavy and inefficient, but bulletproof... Which is a good thing in America.  :D

Doesn't driving very fast through bends also make you difficult to shoot?  :banana:

"Skyyr squealed with glee like a teenager watching that guy get mad while Skyyr shade griefed him for days on end." - Vraciu,
August 28, 2014 0:42:01 PM

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6870
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2017, 08:15:37 AM »
DB engine heads and cylinder one piece.


Offline pembquist

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1929
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2017, 11:27:12 AM »
radial sound way better and I hate radiator hits online

I disagree with the first part, a Merlin sounds better than ANY OTHER aircraft engine.
Pies not kicks.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7794
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2017, 03:59:03 PM »
Griffon sounds cooler.........especially if it has the counter props.

Offline pembquist

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1929
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #41 on: May 22, 2017, 07:09:53 PM »
Bah!
Pies not kicks.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8726
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #42 on: May 22, 2017, 10:22:02 PM »
DB engine heads and cylinder one piece.

(Image removed from quote.)

Stupid German engineers. How the hell do they think they're going to get the cylinder head gaskets in there? I just don't think they thought that through.

"Skyyr squealed with glee like a teenager watching that guy get mad while Skyyr shade griefed him for days on end." - Vraciu,
August 28, 2014 0:42:01 PM

Online SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3876
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #43 on: May 22, 2017, 10:34:31 PM »
The fact is that radials were what the post war airliners used before the jet was introduced. They had the best weight to power ratio, they were reliable, and proven. After all it was a radial Lindbergh used on "The Spirit of St. Louis". And nothing sounds better than an R2800 from start up to full song. imho.

 :salute
Sik
444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17 The Jolly Rogers

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Radial vs. Inline
« Reply #44 on: May 23, 2017, 06:55:12 PM »
DB engine heads and cylinder one piece.

(Image removed from quote.)

It's upside down!  :furious
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."