From an outside view it's almost like your police are an occupying military force dealing with a hostile civilian population. I know it's a generalization and I'm sure it's not like that everywhere.
I agree Vulcan. When the police even in their reporting use the word 'civilian' in the place of 'citizen' it lends itself to the outside view at least, as a militaristic relationship between police and the populace they serve.
Being ex military and ex police it is an appropriate view. A product unfortunately since the 60's. The prevalent use of ex military hires to police forces without adequate decompression time from military transition and training to differentiate from the military 'enemy' view of 'civilians'.
My opinion from both sides of the fence anyway.
On edit: it was an easy observation to me to see the parallel views as a grunt dealing with the military terminology such as 'slopes, dinks, gooks' and in the police shift briefing room transition to 'scumbags, scrotes, punks'.