« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: C-46 ?  (Read 1961 times)

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
C-46 ?
« on: June 03, 2018, 09:33:27 PM »
 Curtis? Lots flew in Asia Theathre(I'm from Chicago) Worthy??
Logged

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2018, 09:35:18 PM »
 My apologies.... Curtiss.
Logged

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2018, 04:56:01 PM »
 Fine, I will prime pump, faster, carries more and longer range, plus added excitement of history of in flight fires!! 
Logged

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2018, 06:18:42 PM »
Its been a favorite of mine since I watched "Ice Pilots".   Might be a good perked transport if they want to go that route, otherwise the C-47 becomes a hangar queen.

This clip has some great flyby audio:


Logged

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2018, 07:18:41 PM »
JU52 first
Logged
Quote from: Skuzzy on January 31, 2012, 09:21:24 AM
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4270
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2018, 10:17:57 PM »
My Brother in law, used to fly those out of Anchorage, hauling fuel to the native villages in Alaska. :cheers:
Logged
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline ONTOS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2018, 12:20:03 PM »
Fiat G55   first
Logged

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9915
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2018, 04:16:46 PM »
Whoa it had two dunnies!
Logged

Offline ONTOS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2018, 04:57:01 PM »
As far as Aces High, the C-47 will do anything the C-46 will do. Same amount of troops and same amount of supplies.
Logged

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2018, 05:43:10 PM »
Might depend how they model it.  I dunno if they'd allow a single aircraft to carry more than 10 troops, but it might be helpful to have a transport with twice the cargo capacity for resupply missions.   Transports are so vulnerable though I don't know how many would risk losing perks to fly it.   

Logged

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2018, 05:42:41 PM »
 Thank y'all!
 Great replies.
Logged

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2018, 07:13:22 PM »
 Humm....carried more....
 MAYBE....10 troops AND field supplies?? Perk it good??
Logged

Offline JimmyC

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5196
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2018, 08:22:35 PM »
Take town and re supp it... nice
Logged
CO 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."

Offline Puma44

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6816
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2018, 10:47:49 AM »
Logged



All gave some, Some gave all

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: C-46 ?
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2018, 04:20:01 PM »
 Ju-52 would be nice....
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »