heeya again Fdski
152 is just as justified as putting meteor in. of course...as soon as you bring Me262 with it...

Perfect match to FW 190A8 isn't it ?
Slower then A4 right ?
FAR slower then P51 and Spitfire 14... and tiffy for that matter...Cc...but try to catch me at 15K
which brings us to the even more interesting point: ( from the very URL you posted
)
The Ta 152C-1 was ...Maximum speed was 227 mph at sea level (356 mph with MW 50),
He must have made a typo there with 227
C model was WHOOPING 6 MPH FASTER THEN H MODEL ON THE DECK. YAHOOOO !!![/b]
Well I think that anyone can have a typing error. and about C faster than H at deck level, it is right. Again ,if you read the page, it explains clearly that C and H designations have nothing to do with the progressive series, but for the fact that H series where optimized for hi altitude performance, and C to medium altitudes. So is perfectly understandable that C series performed better at lower altitudes.
Nah.. let's not stop yet
Shortly after takeoff, he was jumped by four Mustangs. Tank pressed the button which activated his MW 50 boost, opened the throttle wide, and quickly left the Mustangs far behind in a cloud of blue smoke.
We already establised that speed of 152C and H was roughly about the same as P51 on the deck right ?[/b]
Right, but says nothing but acceleration ,nor the altitude of the P51s. At sea level the Ju engine with MW50 delivered 2050hp, what means 600 more hp than mustang...call that acceleration, man. Tank sat down the mustangs, and they were left with no breath
Whole story is fiction BS. He must have had at least SOME room to dive - aka SHORTLY IS MORE THEN FEW MINUTES. and 51's didn't follow for whatever reason.
Truly an achievement. This is not the first time I readed about that "BS fiction" story. It seems to have happened truly in WWII. And "whatever reason"s of P51s were "I cant catch that SOB"
I have a story of a 315 squadron fighing 190's in P51bs in 4 vs 1 odds and killing 16 for a loss of 1. Does this prove that P51b was the best fighter ever below 5k ?and I have stories of German rotten diving through hundreds of russian planes, killing 2 or 3 of them and going out unscathed. Not a valid argument ,and we both know it
Last time i checked there was more LW fighters in this game then any other nation - that's INCLUDING US of A.
Why the hell you asking for 190A5 too ? If its only a tad better then A8 ?
It's gonna bleed E like a little truck ? And be usable to 21,000 ?
Last time i checked 109G10 was a nice little stang killer if flown properly. What ? Can't fight without 4 cannons ?
Right now there are 5 fighter planes of LW. Only 109G2 and G10 are competitive (G2 barely now the mustang and P38 have flaps).
USA has 4 fighters, all of them competitive, and 2 of them (p38 and mustang) HIGHLY competitive. F4Us are a kind of trucks, too, but C version is a blast, and D version isnt bad, too.
fw190A5 has far less wingloading that A8, and with the same engine, and HP, has quite less weight. that means:
a) better acceleration
b) better climbrate
c) better turning
d) less E bleeding.
Seems that a "bit" of these things can make a far better fighter hmmm?
and, yes, over 15K the Fw190A5 will be outclassed as it is right now the A8. The difference is that with the A5 i'll be able to stay more time in fights before needing to break off and run home.
There is no miracle plane that will change the fact that average LW fighter of 1945 ( save for Me 262 ) was at best contemporary to allied fighters of the time.
Fact that LW pilots managed to do so well in them is a testiment to their skill - not a reason to think that there is something wrong in history. Who says Ta152 is better than contemporate to allied planes? I say that I need that contemporating.
152 up to 20k won't be much faster then what you have in 190A8. Ta152 starts to outpacea 190 from 15K
it will turn better, but if are under the impression that you will turn with N1K1's - think again.I am a 190 driver. You dont need to tell me how bad does a 190 turns.
It will be outclimbed by almost EVERY fighter - including spitfire IXe up to 20k. It actually climbs slower then 190A8 low due to those larger wings.then I need some engineering classes, cuz a plane that has a 2050 hp engine and doesnt outclimb a 1800hp plane with a relativelly marginal add in weight, then, must be a kind of X-file.
So you gonnna climb it to 45k ?
And who are you going to fight there ?
Sooner or later you will come down to 20k - where the targets are - and you will dream for 190A8. well yes I'll do climb to 45K and kill some nasty 35000 feet P38s and 109G10s,not to talk about some power dives on B17s

.
And the day that I dream on having a Fw190A8 at 20K then will be a nightmare not a dream. over 15K Fw190 cant fight a fly, let alone an allied plane.

love this kind of threads
------------------
Ram, out
Fw190D9? Ta152H1? The truth is out thereJG2 "Richthofen"[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 04-11-2000).]