Do you understand that ENY is disabled with low numbers?

[Max]

1000 likes for shida the sinsei

agree 1000% with any and all rebuttles

I read nothing bustr types or vracui

but do read all that shida types, and as I know everything you minnions should follow suit

Now where did I leave my Flippz decoder ring????

[Vraciu]

1000 likes for shida the sinsei

agree 1000% with any and all rebuttles

I read nothing bustr types or vracui

but do read all that shida types, and as I know everything you minnions should follow suit

I saw Lippz in a movie once.  It was called DELIVERANCE.   

[Vraciu]

Now where did I leave my Flippz decoder ring????

 

 

He also spelled VRACULA wrong.   

[BOBO]

I saw Lippz in a movie once.  It was called DELIVERANCE.   

That was a good documentary. 

[Oldman731]

That was a good documentary.

heh.

- oldman

[lunaticfringe]

if eny was disabled for low player count--then why on Friday night sep-14th at 2am central--30 players with rooks having a few more players the Knights and bish did rooks have 7.9 eny?   hmmm

[Vraciu]

if eny was disabled for low player count--then why on Friday night sep-14th at 2am central--30 players with rooks having a few more players the Knights and bish did rooks have 7.9 eny?   hmmm

Because "low" is a nebulous concept.   Low to one man is high to another.  That's why people keep talking about this subject despite the dismissal of the issue by some...  My personal feeling is, and has been for some time, that the ENY "ramp" is too steep too soon.

[Arlo]

Because "low" is a nebulous concept.   Low to one man is high to another.  That's why people keep talking about this subject despite the dismissal of the issue by some...  My personal feeling is, and has been for some time, that the ENY "ramp" is too steep too soon.

Your reckless use of 'people' and 'some' is rather non-specific yet off-putting. As is LF's use of 'a few more' despite posting very precise details, otherwise.

Let's ignore, for a second, that the category 'other' very obviously includes the unnamed game producer/owner (even though that person hasn't 'dismissed' the subject, out of hand, at all - as evidenced by Shida's thread title). Some (all, any, one, you ,me, he/she/it?) ... simply don't know to what degree it has been addressed yet find whatever that degree is to be personally unsatisfactory. Did 100% of the player population (of 30 - or so) recently change sides (making every one of them powerless to affect their personal situation)? Seems rather unlikely. Apparently, this example includes a degree of probability of personal selfishness, spread throughout the Rook players (if not all), that all, or some, or at least one, chooses to ignore. Granted, some, or at least one (of the community, not necessarily one of the players involved in the arena on Friday night, September 14th at 2 a.m. U.S. central time 2018), have (has) advocated the complete elimination of side switch lime limitation which would supposedly be the most effective solution. Some (I) are (am) not convinced, given the example at hand without the percent of switch included (even factoring in deliberate spoilers).

Attempts to convince ... some ... that their individual situation might improve if they affect a change that may involve, oh, I dunno, switching sides (which is allowed, within side switching time constraints) is rejected, not out of hand, per say but as an action ... some ... may find equally unsatisfactory. Does this include all thirty players? Some? One (just enough to voice their dissatisfaction on the forum)?



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium

[1stpar3]

  DO WHAAA Kidding,I think

[nrshida]

Might as well lock this thread and let it sink with the rest of locked threads

Thread couldn't even get started because of the ambiguity of this topic being in the same consequential category as how the 12-hour rule protest was handled even before the poo-slinger(s) showed up. I don't think a fair side balancing can be achieved with ENY, side-switching time limits etc. etc. New tools would be needed with the present numbers and disposition of the remaining MA population. Actually considering the latter I don't think it can be accomplished at all.

 

[TequilaChaser]

Arlo, you could have just kept it short, LOL

Something like......

"The Annals of Mathematics"


Cheers

TC

[nrshida]

You had a chance to ask that of Shida in your TE thread, I believe.

Sensei to you.

[nrshida]

He immediately used it as an opportunity to go low and take an 'innocent' shot at Bustr.

We can just agree to disagree what constitutes a low blow.

[TequilaChaser]

Thread couldn't even get started because of the ambiguity of this topic being in the same consequential category as how the 12-hour rule protest was handled even before the poo-slinger(s) showed up. I don't think a fair side balancing can be achieved with ENY, side-switching time limits etc. etc. New tools would be needed with the present numbers and disposition of the remaining MA population. Actually considering the latter I don't think it can be accomplished at all.

 

I don't know, I do understand that for the players that are only able to play AH3 at certain times of the day, do have it rough ..... and although it has been a long time ago for myself having/being able to fly in that time frame, I can relate to the undesirable conditions that could possibly pop up

~S~

if eny was disabled for low player count--then why on Friday night sep-14th at 2am central--30 players with rooks having a few more players the Knights and bish did rooks have 7.9 eny?   hmmm

Not enough imperical data to prove your hypothesis

[nrshida]

Never-the-less, I can surely make one more attempt at it (I've made multiple overtures).

Excellent. Arlo's going to make a game-saving MA map. I'm sure a single carrier group atop a 30k caldera tightly surrounded by island airbases at sea level while GVs fight it out in subterranian caves will have new players flooding in. I eagerly await the opprotunity to 'watch and act impressed'.