but if the Yak3 drivers are so deadly, they would have the perks to continue to fly this aircraft so what has been proposed with perk points would effectively be nulled.
sure it would keep new sticks out of them for a ver small time but the experienced Yak pilots would still have access to them.
as far as ENY is concerned, meh, we pay to play with the toys in this game. We don't pay to be limited in our choices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I disagree. There is something about perked planes that greatly reduced it's usage. The F4U1C or F4U4 are great examples of that. These players would fly the Yak9U instead, which would balance out the fights better. The Yak3, spit16, and La7 usage would greatly be reduced. I believe that a small perk cost would take them from 3500 kills a tour, to about maybe 1500. I say they should be perked because even at 5 eny for an La7 or spit16, it still is a top killer. I have 12,000 perks and could fly temps and 262s for the next year. But I don't. A lot of pilots don't like to be known as the guy who only flies perk planes. Less of these planes overall in the environment would be better off for noobs. iMO the 190D should take the old perk cost of the Ta152. It's just too adundant in the game and makes fights slow and boring. IMO there should be less late war monsters in the game and more mid - late war regular planes. It would just make the fights better overall.
IMO all late war super planes should be perked and people should have to work their way in the game to earn being able to fly one. In almost every other game a new player has to work to unlock better equipment as they progress in the game. This keeps them itching to play the game to be able to score a late war super plane. For some reason in AH it's "unfair for noobs" if they cannot fly a late war monster, but another longer term player whose earned it gets to. I don't see anyone else in other game complaining about that.
