Author Topic: Covid19 Paranoia  (Read 12386 times)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #135 on: April 14, 2020, 12:39:28 PM »
Well hell, Eagler. Release the nukes.

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8269
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #136 on: April 14, 2020, 12:58:56 PM »
My guess is they are studying it in humans too

I bet they are now.  ;)

Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #137 on: April 14, 2020, 01:03:47 PM »
Well hell, Eagler. Release the nukes.

If enough economic damage is done I fear many will think that a viable option especially if China is held responsible
in the end

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #138 on: April 14, 2020, 01:10:36 PM »
If enough economic damage is done I fear many will think that a viable option especially if China is held responsible
in the end

Viable?

adjective

vi·​a·​ble | \ ˈvī-ə-bəl  \

1: capable of living

2: capable of working, functioning, or developing adequately
viable alternatives

I fear that many do not really know what 'viable' means.

Offline Ramesis

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1300
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #139 on: April 14, 2020, 01:19:31 PM »
Viable?

adjective

vi·​a·​ble | \ ˈvī-ə-bəl  \

2: capable of working, functioning, or developing adequately
viable alternatives


Isn't this definition that Eagler had intended?

And fyi, in my day, usage of the word being defined in a definition was a no-no

 :rofl

"Would you tell me, please,
 which way I ought to go from here?
 That depends a good deal on where
 you want to get to. Said the cat."
    Charles Lutwidge Dodgson a.k.a. Lewis Carroll

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8269
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #140 on: April 14, 2020, 01:20:56 PM »
If enough economic damage is done I fear many will think that a viable option especially if China is held responsible
in the end

Well, I'm not sure that would be in our best interests, but in any case, it's irrelevant.  You'll never prove it.

All they have to say is, "Yes we had a bio-lab in Wuhan studying CoronaVirus in bats.  But that is just a coincidence.  This virus started in the wet markets.  So sorry. We've closed those down."

How can you disprove it?  Unless you found a defector from the lab, but I'm sure all the technicians from that clown show are probably already in a hole in the ground covered in quick-lime.

:noid
Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Ramesis

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1300
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #141 on: April 14, 2020, 01:23:40 PM »
Well, I'm not sure that would be in our best interests, but in any case, it's irrelevant.  You'll never prove it.

All they have to say is, "Yes we had a bio-lab in Wuhan studying CoronaVirus in bats.  But that is just a coincidence.  This virus started in the wet markets.  So sorry. We've closed those down."

How can you disprove it?  Unless you found a defector from the lab, but I'm sure all the technicians from that clown show are probably already in a hole in the ground covered in quick-lime.

:noid

Quite possible
 :D
"Would you tell me, please,
 which way I ought to go from here?
 That depends a good deal on where
 you want to get to. Said the cat."
    Charles Lutwidge Dodgson a.k.a. Lewis Carroll

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #142 on: April 14, 2020, 01:25:05 PM »
Isn't this definition what was intended?

And fyi, in my day, usage of the word being defined in a definition was a no-no

 :rofl

Initiating global thermonuclear warfare is supposed to equate to 2: capable of working, functioning, or developing adequately
viable alternatives?

Barry Goldwateresque.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #143 on: April 14, 2020, 02:58:50 PM »
Since when is proof needed to start a war?

Haven't needed that since Pearl Harbor

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #144 on: April 14, 2020, 03:09:51 PM »
Since when is proof needed to start a war?

Haven't needed that since Pearl Harbor

Neither of us mentioned proof (until just now). What I'm suggesting is a nonsensical response to a imagined situation.

I'm guessing at this point (literally) that neither of us find nuclear response a viable option, proof or not. Seems that would also leave conventional war out. Here's to cooler and wiser heads prevailing.

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8269
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #145 on: April 14, 2020, 03:09:57 PM »
Since when is proof needed to start a war?

Haven't needed that since Pearl Harbor

Eagler


Well, this is certainly bad, and is going to get worse.  But I find it hard to believe that any rational American leadership would think it is worth it to engage in a nuclear exchange over this.  It won't just be one way.

That would just be cutting off our nose to spite our face.

Mutually assured destruction is a poor policy choice.  I certainly would suggest jumping to that one first.

:salute





Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18204
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #146 on: April 14, 2020, 04:30:12 PM »
Ok I'll downgrade to a very nasty conventional war or terrorism to start.

Eagler


"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #147 on: April 14, 2020, 04:32:15 PM »
Ok I'll downgrade to a very nasty conventional war or terrorism to start.

We've already had that. Didn't work out.

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2148
Re: Covid19 Paranoia
« Reply #148 on: April 14, 2020, 04:54:33 PM »
We've already had that. Didn't work out.

For God's sake Guys.... give it a rest. The only war to be fought is ALL people vs a Bug. And like small pox, polio, measles, we will win this... at least until the next mega virus.
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.