Author Topic: USMC massive reduction in force  (Read 1987 times)

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2020, 10:19:13 AM »
Army procurement (the name escapes me) rather than McNamara directly.

It was my understanding that McNamera directly made the decision to not chrome plate the chamber and bore of the M16 for two reasons. One for cost saving and the misconception that the rifle did not need regular cleaning to function.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Palace Cobra

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 217
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2020, 12:26:13 PM »
They also bought the wrong ammo to save money.

Offline davidpt40

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1053
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2020, 03:16:11 PM »
While we are on the subject of Macnamara, his most horrendous (and wasteful of human lives) decision was to draft mentally handicapped people into the army.  Known as "Macnamara's 100,000", around 300,000 mentally handicapped individuals were drafted into the military.  They suffered a casualty rate about 3x higher than normal troops. 

Offline Ramesis

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1303
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2020, 04:01:57 PM »
It was my understanding that McNamera directly made the decision to not chrome plate the chamber and bore of the M16 for two reasons. One for cost saving and the misconception that the rifle did not need regular cleaning to function.
And don't forget... He was one of LBJs, quoted with no respect at all, "Whiz Kids"
"Would you tell me, please,
 which way I ought to go from here?
 That depends a good deal on where
 you want to get to. Said the cat."
    Charles Lutwidge Dodgson a.k.a. Lewis Carroll

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2020, 05:26:15 PM »
Remember, military decisions are not made by memembers of the military.  They are made by politicians.  As example, Robert Macnamara both screwed up the M-16 rifle and the TFX (later to be known as the F-111) jet.  Sometimes these politicians listen to military advisors, sometimes they don't (example: Gen Mattis resigning).

My uncle designed something for the m16 in Vietnam. Something to do with helping water drain out of the barrel etc idk.
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #20 on: April 21, 2020, 06:54:25 PM »
It was my understanding that McNamera directly made the decision to not chrome plate the chamber and bore of the M16 for two reasons. One for cost saving and the misconception that the rifle did not need regular cleaning to function.

It wasn't McNamara. It's understandable that his name was on the lips of every soldier of the era, after the "McNamara's Morons" debacle, but it was the nameless Army Procurements Unit that created all of the problems. Also, these problems were not always at issue in Vietnam. What it comes down to is that Remington (who had worked with Stoner on creating the 5.56mm ammunition) were having difficulties supplying enough of the IMR powder used as propellant. The Army made the decision to switch back to their historical favorite ball powder. If you are familiar with reloading you know that ball powder can be measured more quickly because it flows smoother in the powder-flow turrets that munitions manufacturers use. One downside is that ball powders are notorious for sensitive to temperature shifts, and will fire much hotter if the round has been exposed to sun and heat for long periods. When the ball powders were tested the rifles were proofed at 70,000psi, and proved acceptable. However, the port pressures were much higher in actual use because of powder instability. I'm sure you're aware of ammunition "cook-offs" once a rifle is under combat conditions. I don't believe that even a chrome bolt carrier would have saved a rifle in that situation.

EDIT: Concerning the chrome chambers it would not have been the Secretary himself but the Army Ordnance Corps that would have approved non-chromed chambers to be sent to Vietnam. I understand that Colt itself did not do the chroming operations, and so it may be that the individual companies involved may not have been able to accomplish the task properly, or that barrels were rushed into assembly before the task was completed. There is a book out on the topic concerning the subcommittee to investigate the M-16 Rifle program, but I have not been able to locate a copy.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2020, 07:13:15 PM by Chalenge »
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9495
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #21 on: April 21, 2020, 09:07:05 PM »
It wasn't McNamara. It's understandable that his name was on the lips of every soldier of the era, after the "McNamara's Morons" debacle, but it was the nameless Army Procurements Unit that created all of the problems. Also, these problems were not always at issue in Vietnam. What it comes down to is that Remington (who had worked with Stoner on creating the 5.56mm ammunition) were having difficulties supplying enough of the IMR powder used as propellant. The Army made the decision to switch back to their historical favorite ball powder. If you are familiar with reloading you know that ball powder can be measured more quickly because it flows smoother in the powder-flow turrets that munitions manufacturers use. One downside is that ball powders are notorious for sensitive to temperature shifts, and will fire much hotter if the round has been exposed to sun and heat for long periods. When the ball powders were tested the rifles were proofed at 70,000psi, and proved acceptable. However, the port pressures were much higher in actual use because of powder instability. I'm sure you're aware of ammunition "cook-offs" once a rifle is under combat conditions. I don't believe that even a chrome bolt carrier would have saved a rifle in that situation.

EDIT: Concerning the chrome chambers it would not have been the Secretary himself but the Army Ordnance Corps that would have approved non-chromed chambers to be sent to Vietnam. I understand that Colt itself did not do the chroming operations, and so it may be that the individual companies involved may not have been able to accomplish the task properly, or that barrels were rushed into assembly before the task was completed. There is a book out on the topic concerning the subcommittee to investigate the M-16 Rifle program, but I have not been able to locate a copy.


All true.  Well said.

- oldman

Offline davidpt40

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1053
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #22 on: April 22, 2020, 08:02:38 PM »
It wasn't McNamara. It's understandable that his name was on the lips of every soldier of the era, after the "McNamara's Morons" debacle, but it was the nameless Army Procurements Unit that created all of the problems. Also, these problems were not always at issue in Vietnam. What it comes down to is that Remington (who had worked with Stoner on creating the 5.56mm ammunition) were having difficulties supplying enough of the IMR powder used as propellant. The Army made the decision to switch back to their historical favorite ball powder. If you are familiar with reloading you know that ball powder can be measured more quickly because it flows smoother in the powder-flow turrets that munitions manufacturers use. One downside is that ball powders are notorious for sensitive to temperature shifts, and will fire much hotter if the round has been exposed to sun and heat for long periods. When the ball powders were tested the rifles were proofed at 70,000psi, and proved acceptable. However, the port pressures were much higher in actual use because of powder instability. I'm sure you're aware of ammunition "cook-offs" once a rifle is under combat conditions. I don't believe that even a chrome bolt carrier would have saved a rifle in that situation.

EDIT: Concerning the chrome chambers it would not have been the Secretary himself but the Army Ordnance Corps that would have approved non-chromed chambers to be sent to Vietnam. I understand that Colt itself did not do the chroming operations, and so it may be that the individual companies involved may not have been able to accomplish the task properly, or that barrels were rushed into assembly before the task was completed. There is a book out on the topic concerning the subcommittee to investigate the M-16 Rifle program, but I have not been able to locate a copy.

It was a direct decision by Robert Mcnamara.  He was the former head of Ford Motor Company, and he thought he knew about manufacturing.  You need to cite some sources for your radical comments.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2020, 08:04:27 PM by davidpt40 »

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9495
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #23 on: April 22, 2020, 08:03:44 PM »
It was a direct decision by Robert Macnamara.  He was the former head of Ford Motor Company, and he thought he knew about manufacturing.  You need to cite some sources for your radical comments.


....um....so do you...?

- oldman

Offline AKKuya

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2020, 09:35:56 PM »
Have you considered with the US Space Force being realized that the next step would be the US Colonial Marines.  USMC will be the USCM.

Drop ships to take the "Expressway to Hell!!!!!"

Progress in action.  Semper Fi!!!!! :salute
Chuck Norris can pick oranges from an apple tree and make the best lemonade in the world. Every morning when you wake up, swallow a live toad. Nothing worse can happen to you for the rest of the day. They say money can't buy happiness. I would like the opportunity to find out. Why be serious?

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: USMC massive reduction in force
« Reply #25 on: April 22, 2020, 09:38:40 PM »
It was a direct decision by Robert Mcnamara.  He was the former head of Ford Motor Company, and he thought he knew about manufacturing.  You need to cite some sources for your radical comments.

McNamara is the one that closed Rock Island Armory and ended the Ordnance Corps. It was probably the single greatest thing any politician did to save American lives in the 20th Century.

No further discussion can be had unless you have consumed to completion "The Black Rifle" by R. Blake Stevens and Edward C. Ezell. ISBN: 978-0889351158

READ:
EDIT: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1981/06/m-16-a-bureaucratic-horror-story/545153/
« Last Edit: April 22, 2020, 09:43:39 PM by Chalenge »
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.