TBH this is like the global warming/cooling thing. The 70s were predicting we'd be fried by the 90s and so on. Same goes with batteries, we're promised new better batteries every year.
I still think EVs are a bit of a white elephant right now. The cost is still high, the environmental impact is still massive, performance (especially range) is still wanting. And the gorilla in the corner is energy production (except for those willing to accept nuclear).
If I were a gambler I'd probably through my lot in with hydrogen. And I know there are more than a few EV companies hedging their bets with hydrogen.
Hi Vulcan
I assumed when you listed CNBC and Michael Burry as your source of information that you were Shorting Tesla stock. It appears CNBC was wrong about Michael Burry shorting
Tesla. Short sellers have lost between 60-70 billion dollars shorting Tesla stock, depending on which source you read.
https://www.davemanuel.com/2021/06/02/michael-burry-tesla-short/CNBC is owned by Comcast. Comcast receives billions in advertising every year from Legacy car makers in ad revenue. Tesla does not
spend one penny on advertising. Their sales are generated by word of mouth. Is this bias on the part of Comcast? Maybe.....maybe not. It could be a coincidence, but
they publish one article after another with negative comments on Tesla.
Before you short or buy stock in a company that produces fuel cell vehicles it might be a good idea to purchase one and find out how convenient it is to operate. Where will buy the hydrogen to operate it? How often do the fuel cell membranes have to be replaced? What is the efficiency of a fuel cell vehicle compared to a BEV? Is the vehicle reliable and simple
to operate? Will the oil companies be the providers for hydrogen at the recharging stations? How does a hydrogen tank retain its integrity in an automobile collision?
If fuel cell vehicles are a success it will be a good competition for BEV's. Both types of vehicles will progress faster with the competition.