Are you deliberately trying to act stupid or do you really not comprehend what I am saying?....
They were possibly taking out the missile silo 60 days after it shot at the president flying to Singapore.. FFS man.
wait hold, on somebody built a silo in total secrecy, hopping air force 1 would fly over it one day. so the cover story was somebody stole an airplane and flew over the island
60 days after, and that's the best cover story they could come up with? why build a silo?, you do know we have missiles that can be shoulder fired and take out an airplane? why not have 10 or 20 guys with a missile on their shoulder?
you do remember the kiss principle dont you? keep it simple stoopid. why build a silo? instead of having, I dont know 20 or 30 guys with shoulder mounted missiles that can be easily posted all along the pacific coast. why complicate things?
then they waited 60 days to destroy the silo? why not right away? why the secret service didnt report it? why the airforce didn't report a missle?
oh wait they were all into it? remember the kiss principle? if the secret service was on it or the airforce why didnt they just use a syringe to put an air bubble in his neck. heck they could just blame that on a heart attack.
but no, missile was fired, they faked an airplane hijack, then they used that cover story to destroy a missile silo, 60 days after it happened. why not just say, hey one of our planes dropped a bomb by mistake on a training mission. hell they have said that many times before.
see how complicated you make it sound, instead of the kiss principle. hey a bomb fell by mistake that's it. but no, they faked a hijacking, sent f16s up, have video and sound but all of it was a cover story.
who is trying to act stupid?
semp