Author Topic: October FSO - Operation Pedestal  (Read 2717 times)

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« on: September 25, 2022, 06:33:09 AM »
Off to the Mediterranean for October. Please see the event details and make adjustments to your commitment levels and side preferences.

http://www.ahevents.net/index.php/fso-setups/38-mediterranean-theatre/1324-of-decisive-importance-operation-pedestal
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline RichardDarkwood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1925
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2022, 09:06:04 AM »
Bet we'll have a huge attendance for this one
A yappy back seater like Jester wasn’t popular or fun to fly with, more of an unnecessary distraction than anything else---Puma44

https://www.twitch.tv/hounds_darkwood
CO--The Bad Guys

Offline Shrike

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
      • Arabian Knights Official Web Page
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2022, 02:07:23 PM »
The Allied CV's seemed very fragile in this FSO.  Was the hardness lowered for this FSO? 

The last frame it was not possible to setup a defense because we were 5 or 6 sectors from the boat.  Is there some reason we could not have launched from the CV group?  It's my understanding historically the Spits took off from the CV group.
AKShrike - CO Arabian Knights
USA!!!
http://aksquad.net/
USAF 85-95

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2022, 03:46:36 PM »
The Allied CV's seemed very fragile in this FSO.  Was the hardness lowered for this FSO? 

The last frame it was not possible to setup a defense because we were 5 or 6 sectors from the boat.  Is there some reason we could not have launched from the CV group?  It's my understanding historically the Spits took off from the CV group.

The CV and all ships were supposed to be set to MA hardness. If they were not, this was an oversight that I and the staff are apologetic for. However, I am fairly certain, they were set to MA standards.

Although a challenge, it was possible for Spitfires to reach the CV in time. This frame was certainly the most challenging for the Allies as they were asked to do a bulk of the defending with their FAA aircraft since the Spitfires from Furious had already been launched and sent to Malta. Many sorties (some 400) were flown during the week by Spitfires from Malta. This was simulating one of them. The reason why they could not launch from the boat is because they did not fly combat sorties from the CV, only the sortie to Malta on the 11th of August. While your understanding of the Spits rolling from the CV is correct, they did not perform defensive duties on that sortie and instead flew directly to Malta. In Frame 2, we allowed them to roll from the CV AND defend the CV as a way to add fun and playability to the event. That aspect was completely inaccurate and historically, there should have been no Spit 5s in Frame 2.

The remainder of the operation was one of a supply run, mostly aviation fuel and ordnance. However, many Spitfires saw action over the convoy, but those sorties were from Malta. Frame 3 was to be a representation of August 13. This was a larger attack and defensive work done almost solely by the FAA from the carriers in the operation. However, many Spitfires did provide cover from Malta. In the event, the CiC was faced with a tactical dilemma: roll Spits from Malta in hopes of getting there in time and defending the CV or stack the CV defense in hopes of successfully intercepting the Axis. In the end, Frame 3 was the closest frame and the only frame in which the Allies won.

Thank you for your input and interest in our events. I am always happy to discuss balance, designs, etc. with players. If I had to do it again, I would move the CV route closer to Sicily in Frame 2, and closer to Malta in Frame 3. These events, like many aspects of Western culture, cannot improve without criticism. Every event has the potential to be outstanding and to be a dud. Without proper feedback,  we designers cannot judge it. So thank you  :salute.


 
 :airplane:
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline RichardDarkwood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1925
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2022, 04:44:28 PM »
I sank a CV with a peeder and it was FUN as hell.
A yappy back seater like Jester wasn’t popular or fun to fly with, more of an unnecessary distraction than anything else---Puma44

https://www.twitch.tv/hounds_darkwood
CO--The Bad Guys

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2022, 05:35:16 PM »
I sank a CV with a peeder and it was FUN as hell.

Glad to hear it was fun, Darkwood.
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline Logan

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2022, 10:29:19 AM »
Well Perdweed,considering your CO of one the squads that bounced us on the only possible route along the 6 sectors we had to fly to get to the fleet,  I'm not buying that long and disingenuous load. Will not be flying any fso your involved as Cm .

Offline Shrike

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
      • Arabian Knights Official Web Page
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2022, 01:20:26 PM »
The 3rd frame appears to be a predetermined design to prevent a defense to form so I would suggest this be avoided in all future designs.  I think you are correct about moving the ships a little closer.  We want to have a good offense and a good defense, so we have a good battle :).  Thanks for your explanation. :salute

AKShrike - CO Arabian Knights
USA!!!
http://aksquad.net/
USAF 85-95

Offline DH367th

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 771
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2022, 02:09:22 PM »
As the setup CM all CV's were set to MA standards.
You don't have to be crazy but it helps

Offline Shrike

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
      • Arabian Knights Official Web Page
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2022, 03:07:02 PM »
As the setup CM all CV's were set to MA standards.

Hat's off to the buff drivers.

 :salute
AKShrike - CO Arabian Knights
USA!!!
http://aksquad.net/
USAF 85-95

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #10 on: October 26, 2022, 03:34:08 PM »
Well Perdweed,considering your CO of one the squads that bounced us on the only possible route along the 6 sectors we had to fly to get to the fleet,  I'm not buying that long and disingenuous load. Will not be flying any fso your involved as Cm .

True, I am the CO of an Axis squad. It is also true that we targeted Spits in the frame that were enroute the CV. I won't repeat what I said earlier to Strike. But, there was a tactical conundrum to be solved. Do you stack the defense with your CV aircraft or try to make it with a lot of Spits? The Axis put a lot of eggs in the Spit basket as we expected the Allies to roll a lot of Spits instead of going the safe route and flying off the boats. In the end, it did not work for the Axis as the Allies won the frame. It was also the only frame that the Allies won.

I am sorry that you feel my long response was disingenuous, I can assure you it was not. I do not appreciate being called partial as a designer, I am anything but partial. But, from your perspective, I can see where you could make that judgment. I'm very sorry that Frame 3 was not fun for you and that it has tarnished your view of FSO. I promise, it was not my intention to make it favor one side over the other. I will do my utmost in the future to ensure this is obvious. Designing CMs are all objective, impartial, and do everything in their ability to ensure every event us balanced, fair, and interesting for the player base.

Sadly, sometimes we miss as designers. Some events look good on paper and do not play very well in the arena. Sometimes what seems awesome in our minds does not always end up that way in the event. I apologize for delivering a lackluster event for you. I appreciate the feedback as always.

 :salute
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline RichardDarkwood

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1925
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2022, 03:37:29 PM »
Well Perdweed,considering your CO of one the squads that bounced us on the only possible route along the 6 sectors we had to fly to get to the fleet,  I'm not buying that long and disingenuous load. Will not be flying any fso your involved as Cm .

My group was flying right next Perdweebs group as per our orders. We all got there at the same time.

These guys usually put on a good event. True the plane set did suck but it was FUN either way.
A yappy back seater like Jester wasn’t popular or fun to fly with, more of an unnecessary distraction than anything else---Puma44

https://www.twitch.tv/hounds_darkwood
CO--The Bad Guys

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #12 on: October 26, 2022, 03:39:08 PM »
The 3rd frame appears to be a predetermined design to prevent a defense to form so I would suggest this be avoided in all future designs.  I think you are correct about moving the ships a little closer.  We want to have a good offense and a good defense, so we have a good battle :).  Thanks for your explanation. :salute

It was not predetermined as the Aliied CiC was expected to solve the issue at hand. Had the CiC rolled only a handful of Spits and put 40+ on defense from the CV, it would have been a slaughter. The Axis sent about 20 109s to cut off Spits which there could have been zero of. There was no prevention of defense as the Allies could have rolled all F4F and Hurricanes if they wanted.

I understand your complaint and I think it is warranted. The action should have been a little closer in both frames. But, to argue accuracy or partiality is incorrect. I appreciate your feedback and urge you to always leave feedback on FSO designs. It really helps them improve.

 :salute
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4680
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #13 on: October 26, 2022, 03:39:45 PM »
My group was flying right next Perdweebs group as per our orders. We all got there at the same time.

These guys usually put on a good event. True the plane set did suck but it was FUN either way.


Early war setups need love, too! C'est la vie.
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
      • http://www.9giap.com
Re: October FSO - Operation Pedestal
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2022, 07:38:34 AM »
I was escorting Ju88s in C202s.  We were fighting spits off while the bombs were dropping.  There were massive clouds of Hurris pouring into the attack as well.  Oddly enough, one trio out the front (Goldy) was pounced by a staggering amount of Hurris.  This let the others get close enough to drop.  Not a whole lot of them got away.

Spits weren't necessary.  Way over-kill.  Still they were in the frame and despite not having time to get there, from the logs, they managed more than 20 Ju88 kills.


Willing to play frame again, same sides, with Spit V and C202 swap.


I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.