Author Topic: World Economic Forum  (Read 3593 times)

Offline nopoop

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3146
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #15 on: August 22, 2023, 06:01:03 PM »
Yes bacon !!!
nopoop

It's ALL about the fight..

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17360
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #16 on: August 22, 2023, 06:10:03 PM »
bacon and insects



semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2148
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #17 on: August 22, 2023, 06:17:42 PM »
I would give each one of them a bullit which they could use to end their devestation on our planet. My contribution to cleaning the earth.

Always thought a spelling test might be a good precursor to exercising one's 2nd amendment rights. :rolleyes:
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.

Offline RUSH1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 574
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #18 on: August 22, 2023, 07:08:19 PM »
Always thought a spelling test might be a good precursor to exercising one's 2nd amendment rights. :rolleyes:

No problem as long as the same test could be used in determining one's right to vote.  At the very least it would save the DNC a lot of money and manpower as there would be far less votes to harvest.   
“Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.” - Ronald Reagan

Offline knorB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 858
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #19 on: August 22, 2023, 07:11:36 PM »
Always thought a spelling test might be a good precursor to exercising one's 2nd amendment rights. :rolleyes:

God given, fascist.

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12794
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2023, 07:22:06 PM »
Id like to see that in order to be a registered voter, you must prove you are a US citizen.  No citizenship = no vote. But then where would the "magical mystery ballots" come from at the last minutes?  :headscratch:
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline DmonSlyr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6658
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #21 on: August 22, 2023, 07:33:13 PM »
NVM, what does it even matter on this forum...

Another thread ripe for the cull  :devil
 



« Last Edit: August 22, 2023, 08:32:22 PM by DmonSlyr »
The Damned(est. 1988)
-=Army of Muppets=-
2014 & 2018 KoTH ToC Champion

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2148
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #22 on: August 22, 2023, 09:20:38 PM »
God given, fascist.

God given? Seriously? God's name is really Jimmy Madison? :rolleyes:
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17360
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #23 on: August 22, 2023, 09:23:31 PM »
let me get this straight.  los angeles is going to banned meat and all the people that love mexican food will give it up for insects.  cool, what is to stop them from driving 30 minutes to another city that sells meat.  :uhoh :uhoh :uhoh

what most people dont know is what we call los angeles is actually about 60 something cities. like cane himself said, he lives in san bernardino county, that could be from 100 miles to 20 or 30 miles from los angeles.  so he said he didnt vote for it, he dont have to, he doesnt live close to los angeles.

but back on point, you really think all those people will willingly give up mexican food, or salvadoran or name any other country?  they will just ignore it and if forced, vote the people out.

this is one really stupid conspiracy theory.  coming from somebody who doesnt know that san Bernardino County is not close to the city of los angeles.


misspelting are on purpose.



semp


you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8581
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #24 on: August 23, 2023, 12:34:24 AM »
Wouldn't it be much more effective to forbid eating? That way we would reduce many harmful things.

Like daft people who can't reason their way out of a wet paper bag?

If a vegan++ diet is good enough for the Rastafari then it's good enough for the rest of you.  :old:

"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15545
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #25 on: August 23, 2023, 03:10:04 AM »
you really think all those people will willingly give up

Willingly?

Here are the common tools:
-- Higher taxes (to account for the environmental, health, and societal harm it does).
-- Higher regulation on farms or processing plants (with regard to emissions, effluents, safety of product, humane treatment of animals, disposal, allowed feed, allowed quantity of feed, allowed land, allowed arrangement of buildings and sizes, need for reams of permits that cost a lot and take forever to get, and whatever else can be thought up).
-- Higher regulation on transport.
-- Increase law suits (over any perceived violations, driving up cost of insurance and risk of being in that business).
-- Constant propaganda (in papers, studies talking about how bad for you meat is, and how bad for the world it is, have teachers teach kids constantly how bad it is for them and the world).
-- Maybe make some of it illegal.  No animals under a certain age.  Make some cuts of meat illegal, like t-bones (because of mad cow) or babybacks (because of age).
-- Maybe have rules on how and where it can be displayed so as not to offend particular religious groups, or vegitarians, as that is not inclusive.
-- Maybe mandate that a certain percentage of meat sold (in stores, or in fast food, or other restaurants) has to be synthetic or insect-based.  Ramp up that percentage over time.  Or it's not mandatory, but if your restaurant chain doesn't do it, it pays much higher taxes (for the impact to health and environment), and/or places that comply get pay offs (i.e., tax breaks).
-- Maybe outright price regulation at some point, or quotas.

You can start out small, but keep at it diligently, and ramp it up over a longer time span.

Fear not.  Cricket tacos can be in your California future.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18207
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2023, 06:21:28 AM »
No problem as long as the same test could be used in determining one's right to vote.  At the very least it would save the DNC a lot of money and manpower as there would be far less votes to harvest.   

Odd how the videos of those doing the harvesting have disappeared from YT...there were many showing their dashes filled with purchased ballots..zuck bucks provided the unsupervised drop boxes

I did like the clip of his lawyer being charged in GA stating "Absolutely " when asked if he thought it was stolen..



Eagler
« Last Edit: August 23, 2023, 06:57:21 AM by Eagler »
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27071
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #27 on: August 23, 2023, 07:33:34 AM »
Always thought a spelling test might be a good precursor to exercising one's 2nd amendment rights. :rolleyes:

Must be much easier to type on a phone for those with small hands.  :rofl
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #28 on: August 23, 2023, 07:36:04 AM »
I would give each one of them a bullit which they could use to end their devestation on our planet. My contribution to cleaning the earth.

That generally is a cure for that particular type of narcissistic sociopaths.

C.S. Lewis:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: World Economic Forum
« Reply #29 on: August 23, 2023, 07:40:03 AM »
God given? Seriously? God's name is really Jimmy Madison? :rolleyes:

No. But Madison deferred to The Creator, and that subject, and most others. So did Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, Paine, Hamilton, Adams, and the vast majority of the rest.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe