I saw it years ago.
And have read plenty about his story.
I'm not going to say he is lying, but he just doesn't seem credible to me.
Top secret college degree and all. Did he have no classmates that could verify his attendance in class? No professors that remember him in their class?
Or did the government make them all disappear?
You could make a lot of the same arguments about #44 and all the sealed college records with a very shady past, and yet these guys would say he was perfectly reputable. I guess it's all about who you chose to admire and who you chose to ridicule...
That being said, it would still fascinate me that this guy would know a lot of the stuff he does, or if he simply just made it up, how brilliant that in itself would be. To generate this level of publicity. I mean, he could be a cia plant afterall, but why? And his story reminds me a lot of the current whistle-blower testimony. Of course you always have to take them with a grain of salt, however when you look at such things over time, like the Battle of LA, or the UFOs over the Whitehouse Film. And countless other examples and crashes. Other whistle blower types like Phil Schneider. You'd have to think there may perhaps be something that is being reverse engineered and there is far more to this, and they don't want to tell us for national security reasons, though it's being leaked out.
