Author Topic: The Baltimore Bridge  (Read 2898 times)

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27070
Re: The Baltimore Bridge
« Reply #45 on: April 17, 2024, 12:13:31 PM »
It was the port anchor and it was dropped to try to slow ans counter the movement to starboard. The quick turn to starboard looked more like propwalk (full reverse) as a ship that size does not maneuver like that normally.
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Professor_Fate

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: The Baltimore Bridge
« Reply #46 on: April 17, 2024, 01:17:30 PM »
It was the port anchor and it was dropped to try to slow ans counter the movement to starboard. The quick turn to starboard looked more like propwalk (full reverse) as a ship that size does not maneuver like that normally.

Been on the bridge most of my adult life and that’s what it looked to me too. Does the captain risk going under the bridge as intended hoping he doesn’t hit it or do everything possible to take all way off using engines and anchors.  With a ship that size all it takes is a small tap and it’s going break something.  Kinetic energy is biatch.
Jagdgeschwader 2 "Richthofen