2 weeks ago, the cpu failed on my main computer.
Took me a week to figure out it was the cpu because of the weird progression of the problem and confounding indications. The sordid tale:
-- Opened an e-mail that was malware,
-- started doing virus scans,
-- d: drive sata hard disk directories stared to become unavailable (which reinforced malware indication) but could have been bad HD or bad cable, or bad sata port (which all needed checking out),
-- did fresh reinstall of OS to get around any potential malware issue,
-- found that hard disk and cables and sata port weren't the issue (through lots of swapping),
-- RAM wasn't issue (as did memtest),
-- temperature wasn't an issue (measured it over time),
-- then started getting network instability and increasing HD instability (which pointed to motherboard) but could be cpu or power supply (but cpu failure is so rare for me, and hwinfo showed fine power from psu)
-- then instability that would result in reboots without bsod (started with network instability and eventually would reboot)
-- event viewer wasn't much help, other than slight indication it was cpu (but although dealing with 100+ computers in my life, don't think I ever had cpu failure)
-- Could be mb, or psu, or cpu. Cpu is most expensive and least likely, so:
-- replaced MB with new one, same issues
-- replaced PSU with new one, same issues
-- replaced cpu, issue solved
My question. Do any of you computer experts think it would be at all viable to try underclocking that cpu to see if it would then work and be stable? My feeling is not to bother, and not worth the effort. But I am curious. Any of you guys ever do such a thing?