Author Topic: Real Life conundrum  (Read 382 times)

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5005
      • Aces High Tech Hangar
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #15 on: Yesterday at 06:43:31 PM »
I suspect you are relatively young in comparison to most people who post on these forums. With that in mind, I hope when the day arrives that your life might depend on advanced pharmaceutical research (assuming it still exists) that you might change your mind about the science.

And by the way, he was caught on many lies.

They hate science until it saves their life in the hospital.
Aces High Tech Hangar
(Windows 11 gaming tweaks, Buyer Guides, Dogfight Tutorials)

You Tube Videos

Offline AKKuya

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #16 on: Yesterday at 07:36:20 PM »
You're walking down the sidewalk and spot a 20-dollar bill in front of a store.  Do you ignore and walk on? Do you stop and pick up and place in your pocket?  Do you stop and pick up and enter the store to ask anyone lost a 20-dollar bill?

Future CEO of Aces High Inc.
Rule #1 I make the rules
Rule #2 If in doubt, refer to above rule

Offline DmonSlyr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7100
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #17 on: Yesterday at 08:26:18 PM »
They hate science until it saves their life in the hospital.

No one is attacking "science" or hates it..its such a broad generalization to make...science is a process. Its not a science vs spirituality debate. If the the experiment doesn't agree with your hypothesis, than you should acknowledge that it doesn't agree. Not look for many ways to force it to agree through manipulation and then pass it to people that it agrees even though it doesn't.

Theres a difference between medicine and surgery. Theres a difference between all known biological and chemical substances that can be used to treat people. Theres also a difference between how it affects people. I had an allergic reaction and body froze stiff for a week after taking a drug prescribed to me after braking my wrist as a child. You never know the reaction youll have. Hell this Ozympic stuff is really really bad for some people. Trial by error with medications is science itself. All im saying is that people should be fully aware of potential risks that may affect them and for "experts" to make sure people understand that there are risks rather than shoving very new medications down everyones throats through extremely strong media propaganda and coercion. If we are to have something like a HHS, than it should be used to make sure companies arent misleading the public and hold them accountable for it.
The Damned(est. 1988)
-=Army of Muppets=-
2014 & 2018 KoTH ToC Champion

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2347
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #18 on: Yesterday at 09:09:35 PM »
No one is attacking "science" or hates it..its such a broad generalization to make...science is a process. Its not a science vs spirituality debate. If the the experiment doesn't agree with your hypothesis, than you should acknowledge that it doesn't agree. Not look for many ways to force it to agree through manipulation and then pass it to people that it agrees even though it doesn't.

Theres a difference between medicine and surgery. Theres a difference between all known biological and chemical substances that can be used to treat people. Theres also a difference between how it affects people. I had an allergic reaction and body froze stiff for a week after taking a drug prescribed to me after braking my wrist as a child. You never know the reaction youll have. Hell this Ozympic stuff is really really bad for some people. Trial by error with medications is science itself. All im saying is that people should be fully aware of potential risks that may affect them and for "experts" to make sure people understand that there are risks rather than shoving very new medications down everyones throats through extremely strong media propaganda and coercion. If we are to have something like a HHS, than it should be used to make sure companies arent misleading the public and hold them accountable for it.


Apparently, you don't listen to and/or read all the possible side effects that the CDC requires to be published with all pharmaceuticals both old and new.
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.