Author Topic: Real Life conundrum  (Read 2419 times)

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9299
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #30 on: September 07, 2025, 10:31:57 AM »
Or science adjusts its views based on politics.

More like politicians change their views on science and the rabble just go along with it.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7442
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #31 on: September 07, 2025, 11:42:31 AM »

The problem with "vaccines" is not the vaccine itself but rather the adjuvants that accompany them.   

Aggressive scheduling is causing people to walk around with high levels of adjuvant. 

I haven't studied MRNA vaccines but it seems they also use an adjuvant.   

If you have an aggressive vaccination schedule and lupus-like symptoms, back off a little.   Advants clear over time.    If you don't allow them to clear, you will experience bad things.

Offline DmonSlyr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7158
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #32 on: September 07, 2025, 12:21:33 PM »
Just science I guess. Since it doesn't agree with some of yalls perspective, you just gonna claim its "not real science" 🤷‍♂️. You see if it did actually work, we would acknowledge that but it seems like yall are the ones who can't understand that maybe things weren't what the companies told you. So long as they made billions on profit...

https://x.com/NicHulscher/status/1961163339943555185?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1961163339943555185%7Ctwgr%5E3cd26fd0cd7529a536a98b8e9b05fdd5b10a4070%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreatawakening.win%2Fp%2F1AR0C4M5y7%2Fbreaking-three-peerreviewed-stud%2Fc%2F



See new posts
Conversation
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

@NicHulscher
🚨BREAKING: THREE Peer-Reviewed Studies Provide IRREFUTABLE Grounds for Immediate Market Withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA Injections🚨

Two MAJOR papers were just published in the past 48 hours, building directly on our recent landmark study.

Together, the international evidence has converged: mRNA injections are unsafe, ineffective, contaminated, and in violation of international law 👇

📑 The Papers:

1️⃣ COVID-19 Injections: Harms and Damages, a Non-Exhaustive Conclusion (Zywiec, Mavrakakis, McCullough, Hulscher, et al., Aug 2025)

• Legal/Ethical: both virus and injections contain engineered elements in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention

• Genomic forensics reveal engineered viral/vaccine features consistent with DARPA’s DEFUSE proposal

• Cardiovascular system: strong links to myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes, and arrhythmias

• Reproductive system: high rates of pregnancy loss, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths

• Immune system: collapse marked by viral reactivation, autoimmune disease, and cancer acceleration

2️⃣ Regulatory and Safety Assessment of COVID-19 mRNA-LNP Genetic Vaccines in Japan: Evidence for Revocation of Approval and Market Withdrawal (Ueda, Fukushima, et al., Aug 2025)

• 103M people injected without any nationwide safety investigation or long-term monitoring

• Misclassified as “vaccines” rather than gene therapy products, bypassing stricter regulatory standards

• Critical studies never conducted — including biodistribution, organ toxicity, carcinogenicity, placental transfer, and fetal safety

• Independent labs detected plasmid DNA contamination, including SV40 promoter sequences with known oncogenic potential

• Legal and ethical breaches documented: concealment of harms, suppression of mortality data, and approvals granted without clinical trials

3️⃣Review: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits (Hulscher, Bowden, McCullough, Jan 2025)

• 81,000+ physicians/scientists/citizens, 240 government officials, 17 professional physician and scientific organizations demand withdrawal

• VAERS-adjusted deaths >589K U.S.; ~17M global

• Exceeds FDA recall thresholds by 375,000%

• Negative efficacy: boosted = higher infection risk

• DNA contamination 65,000% above limits

📢Together, these three studies converge on the same conclusion: Immediate global withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA injections is essential to prevent further loss of life.

Now is the time to stand on the right side of history — or be remembered by future generations as complicit in one of the greatest tragedies of our time.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2025, 12:24:26 PM by DmonSlyr »
The Damned(est. 1988)
-=Army of Muppets=-
2014 & 2018 KoTH ToC Champion

Offline hazmatt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1935
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #33 on: September 07, 2025, 02:21:43 PM »
I think if you want to get a vaccine and 10 boosters you should be able to.
I also think that if you don't want one, nobody should be forced to get one.

Lets try some logic.
If a vaccine works, and you take it then you should be protected.
If I don't take it then I'm the one who wouldn't be protected.
The "logic" I hear reminds me of that thing where: If I don't wear deodorant, your deodorant won't work. Maybe I'm allergic to deodorant and I don't mind a little stink... 

Same thing with fluoride in the water. It's supposed to be applied topically to teeth, like sunscreen to skin. Have you ever gone to the dentist for a fluoride treatment and he gave you a cup of fluoride and told you to drink as much as you'd like?
So lets follow the logic. Putting fluoride in the water is like drinking sunscreen and there is no dosage control. People who drink very little water would get a minimal dosage and people who drink lots of water would get a very high dose. Since when does the medical establishment condone uncontrolled dosages? I won't even go to the side effects of high dosages.

I guess the "my body my choice" only applies to some things but not to other things.

Offline Eviscerate

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #34 on: September 07, 2025, 02:39:31 PM »
I guess the "my body my choice" only applies to some things but not to other things.
Like the choice of vaccines but no choice for an abortion? Right? Right?

Offline uptown

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8740
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #35 on: September 07, 2025, 09:53:51 PM »
The Lord gives us choice to weed out the stupid. At least that's the way it translates to me. If you're going to put crazy stuff in your body, you better do your research first. Physically and spiritually especially with all this DNA tampering and such. Have you guys seen the rabbits in Colorado with tenacles growing out their heads? With all the stuff they're pumping into me right now, I'm looking for a 3 ear every day.  :O
Lighten up Francis

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2361
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #36 on: September 08, 2025, 07:28:48 AM »
If you're going to put crazy stuff in your body, you better do your research first.

There's the rub... it takes years of education in microbiology, biochemistry and God knows what before a person gets to participate in the development of new medications and vaccines. Know any of these people that you trust? Seems to me that a raven loving lawyer with a gravelly voice carries more weight with most.
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.

Offline Eviscerate

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 163
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #37 on: September 08, 2025, 07:40:11 AM »
There's the rub... it takes years of education in microbiology, biochemistry and God knows what before a person gets to participate in the development of new medications and vaccines. Know any of these people that you trust? Seems to me that a raven loving lawyer with a gravelly voice carries more weight with most.
Is that the guy who literally told the country "I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me"?

And yet...

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7442
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #38 on: September 08, 2025, 07:42:08 AM »
There's the rub... it takes years of education in microbiology, biochemistry and God knows what before a person gets to participate in the development of new medications and vaccines. Know any of these people that you trust? Seems to me that a raven loving lawyer with a gravelly voice carries more weight with most.

Molecular biology.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13744
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #39 on: September 08, 2025, 09:52:26 AM »
Too bad education doesn't mean trustworthiness. Or even intelligence.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7442
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #40 on: September 08, 2025, 11:49:50 AM »
Or science adjusts its views based on politics.

Yep........it has happened.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13744
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #41 on: September 08, 2025, 12:05:38 PM »
Funny how a change in fundamentals like the age of the Universe can throw the "experts" into a spin. There's usually a risk in thinking you know something.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27487
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #42 on: September 08, 2025, 12:36:21 PM »
Like the choice of vaccines but no choice for an abortion? Right? Right?

No one to speak for the baby......
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline RUSH1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 746
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #43 on: September 08, 2025, 02:03:38 PM »
No one to speak for the baby......

Or the father.   
“Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.” - Ronald Reagan

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15827
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Real Life conundrum
« Reply #44 on: September 11, 2025, 10:20:38 PM »
You ask... "Are you a truthful person?"

The person answers.... "No".

....... why would you believe them?

From the Star Trek episode "I, Mudd":

NORMAN: What?
KIRK: He lied. Everything Harry tells you is a lie. Remember that. Everything Harry tells you is a lie.
MUDD: Listen to this carefully, Norman. I am lying.
NORMAN: You say you are lying, but if everything you say is a lie then you are telling the truth, but you cannot tell the truth because everything you say is a lie. You lie. You tell the truth. But you cannot for. Illogical! Illogical! Please explain.
(Smoke comes out of Norman's head.)