Whether or not you like him is irrelevant to whether or not he said terrible things. I didn’t say the awful things he did. Unless of course you agree with these statements? Do you?
I literally said he shouldn’t have been murdered. I don’t care what other people say. You’re more fragile than we thought I guess.
lol simulation loading… what he said has nothing to do with the context you just described. Those were just two of the litany of awfulness that he vomited. I’m pretty sure you’re too old to be doing these kind of gymnastics in your head.
I guess it would have been ok if he was standing in 5th avenue instead of a chair on a stage.
Actually, that is directly from the discussion where he said that. And if you believe that you can hire 50% of your pilots from 13% of the population, and get the same quality that you get hiring from over 50% of the population, then you quite literally ignore math. And yeah, considering the pilot is the main factor in deciding whether or not you survive the flight, I want my pilot to be in the top 5% of all applicants, regardless of race or sex, neither of which I want to be considered at all.
You can choose to ignore facts, logic, reason, math, and physics. The consequences of ignoring them will find you eventually.
Charlie Kirk had civil discourse with, and gave a microphone to, anyone willing to discuss anything with him, despite many of them yelling, screaming, cursing, and threatening him.
Never once did he call for any harm to come to anyone who disagreed with him. The same cannot be said for many who did disagree with him. It's truly sad that most people who speak ill of him have to take things out of context, alter quotes, or outright lie about things he said. Sadder still is that most of them are utterly oblivious to what he actually said.
If you can't quote the full conversation, in full context, then you're intellectually and morally dishonest, and there's absolutely no point in discussing anything with you.