Congrats! You got your war...

[CptTrips]

They were rebuilding it and no longer tried to claim it was for peaceful purposes. Don't you read the news?

So are we done?

Is that mission accomplished?

Or are we committed to regime change?

When you start a war you should know two things (at least):
1.  What does Victory look like?
2.  If you can't get Victory, what are you willing to accept as minimal exit crtieria.


Without those you get sucked into Forever-Wars.

[Eagler]

They were rebuilding it and no longer tried to claim it was for peaceful purposes. Don't you read the news?

Well then we were lied to the 1st time and it wasn't destroyed to the point we were told it was...

But lets believe them this time..I  guess that's where my trust issues begin..they all lie to our faces to push their agenda regardless of what we were previously told/promise...

I didn't hear anything about regime change in Iran during the 2024 run-up to November...did I miss that tidbit..

I heard he was going to stop the killing in Ukraine before he was even sworn in...some of you must be a treat for the average used car salesman..

Eagler

[AKIron]

Pointless to argue here. Watch and learn.

[Eagler]

Eagler

[CptTrips]

Pointless to argue here. Watch and learn.

I do believe there is going to be some learning occurring.

We will touch base on this again later to check on the polarity.

[CptTrips]

Two more and that radar operator would be an Ace.

[Busher]

So are we done?

Is that mission accomplished?

Or are we committed to regime change?

When you start a war you should know two things (at least):
1.  What does Victory look like?
2.  If you can't get Victory, what are you willing to accept as minimal exit crtieria.


Without those you get sucked into Forever-Wars.

Captain, I enjoy the clear logic of your posts but it seems to be falling on deaf ears. Maybe "obliterated" means different things to different people.

There is a trial going on as we speak that examines the error in giving an AR15 to an unstable teen. I cannot help but to see a parallel.

[AKIron]

When the people of Iran rise and take back their country from the Islamic Republic that conquered them 47 years ago and has oppressed them since I expect to hear the panicans here admitting they were wrong. Of course I know you will not.

[CptTrips]

When the people of Iran rise and take back their country from the Islamic Republic that conquered them 47 years ago and has oppressed them since I expect to hear the panicans here admitting they were wrong. Of course I know you will not.

I will.  And I will be glad to be wrong.  I suspect something more like Syria failed-state or the failed post-GW1 uprising debacle.


But answer this, if the regime holds on, are you willing to call the more obliterateded weapons program exit criteria achieved?

Or are we committed to regime change?

For you personally, are you willing to see it stop now?

[rabbidrabbit]

The claim being that they were aggressively reconstituting everything they could and were preparing rockets to be used as dirty bombs.  True or not, I don't know.  I do know that the discussion is pretty much irrelevant at this point. 

There is evidence that Iran was dirtying up missiles as early as 2020

Operation Epic Fury: Why Iran's Ballistic Missile Force Remains the Greatest Threat

These military testing memos are strong evidence Iran experimented with and deployed contaminated or "dirty warheads" against US forces as early as January 2020.
 
We obtained the memos as… pic.twitter.com/hu6vxTOCBM

— Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) March 2, 2026

[RUSH1]

When the people of Iran rise and take back their country from the Islamic Republic that conquered them 47 years ago and has oppressed them since I expect to hear the panicans here admitting they were wrong. Of course I know you will not.

Of course, they won't.  These are the same people who will still try to justify the $32 million Russian collusion investigation.   

[Eagler]

Of course, they won't.  These are the same people who will still try to justify the $32 million Russian collusion investigation.   

I know you don't have me in that group...if you do you definitely don't know me..

I'm still waiting for the tv trial of those that orchestrated that phony tv trial but I see that will happen right after  the pedophiles in charge/ entertainment get their day in court..so never...

Yes rabbidrabbit that is about how I figured they'd justify this action.. after the fact and way too late to actually confirm or take a different course of action..

I remember Iraq having weapons of mass destruction beforethey didn't....I was a cheerleader for that conflict back then like some are for this one now....

Eagler

[rabbidrabbit]

I know you don't have me in that group...if you do you definitely don't know me..

I'm still waiting for the tv trial of those that orchestrated that phony tv trial but I see that will happen right after  the pedophiles in charge/ entertainment get their day in court..so never...

Yes rabbidrabbit that is about how I figured they'd justify this action.. after the fact and way too late to actually confirm or take a different course of action..

I remember Iraq having weapons of mass destruction beforethey didn't....I was a cheerleader for that conflict back then like some are for this one now....

Eagler

You won't find me disagreeing with that gross abuse of power, to put it lightly.  I'm a big fan of truth for what it is.  Unfortunately, all sides spin their narratives based on pieces of truth at the expense of society.  That being said, it's yet another irrelevant diversion from the thread topic.

[Randy1]

The question at hand is a simple one.  Were they developing a nuclear weapon as a religious offensive or defensive weapon?

[AKIron]

We can't argue this here without getting muted so I'm not trying. Just know there is a lot more to be said about what's going on than what I'm saying.