Hijabs where..

[AKIron]

All you have to do is look at what Iran has done for the last 47 years. Continuously attacked our only democratic ally in the region through their proxies. They throw acid in the face of girls who aren't covering them and homosexuals off buildings. There is a war going on and it is being waged at many levels. Be careful who you choose to believe.

[AKIron]

If the civilian populace there largely supports the IRGC then we should have no qualms in bringing Iran fully to its knees by destroying their oil producing capability. We have refrained because we know they do not.

Logic.

[CptTrips]

All you have to do is look at what Iran has done for the last 47 years. Continuously attacked our only democratic ally in the region through their proxies. They throw acid in the face of girls who aren't covering them and homosexuals off buildings. There is a war going on and it is being waged at many levels. Be careful who you choose to believe.

None of that justifies a violation of the Constitution.

Petty dictators always have a long laundry list of reason they must violate the Constitution.

There are no valid reasons for violating the Constitution.  Ever.

[AKIron]

No one is violating the Constitution or every president has. Congress has acknowledged the President's right to take immediate action as needed.

[CptTrips]

No one is violating the Constitution or every president has. Congress has acknowledged the President's right to take immediate action as needed.

If other Presidents violated the Constitution then it is ok for this one to?

Did that logic work with your Mom when we were kids?



Every President who has done that needed to have been Impeached.  See.  That is easy.
Lets start re-establishing the precident.

[AKIron]

If the right to declare war rests solely with Congress then so does their right to grant the President the ability to take immediate action as he sees fit for 60 days.

I'm telling you that this is not unconstitutional. Open your eyes.

[CptTrips]

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cddpygv2j90o

For Slayer who was claiming my images were fake.

[AKIron]

I'm not even going to click a link to the bbc.

[AKIron]

Congress fully understands that it does not have the ability to respond to threats in real time. It therefore has given the President the right to respond without Congressional approval for 60 days. Every president in recent history has exercised this right. If you are ignorant of this you should educate yourself.

[CptTrips]

If the right to declare war rests solely with Congress then so does their right to grant the President the ability to take immediate action as he sees fit for 60 days.

No. 

ONLY when there is an existent emergency that needs to be dealt with before Congress can be convened.

There was no immediate threat to made it impossible to get authorization first.

You're cheering for a dictator just because he is your dictator.  You won't like the dictator AOC when she does the same stuff.  That is the problem when people choose their domestic politics over the Constitution.

The only reason he didn't go to Congress is he knows his justification and plan wouldn't pass examination. 

He didn't skip the Constitutional  because he had to.  He skipped it because he doesn't believe in our Constitution.  He just sees our Constitution as an annoyance in his way.


If this wasn't Iran and a Dem Pres, you'd be agreeing with me left and right. 

And we're past the 60 days now.  He is still trying to avoid his Constituional duties.

[AKIron]

You know what is unconstitutional? Stealing an election is a complete defiance of the Constitution and renders it entirely impotent. Even one illegal vote is a traitorous act.

[CptTrips]

I'm not even going to click a link to the bbc.

You should stick to safe sources.

Breitbart, DailyStormer, etc.

[CptTrips]

You know what is unconstitutional? Stealing an election is a complete defiance of the Constitution and renders it entirely impotent. Even one illegal vote is a traitorous act.

Did you find that Chinese bamboo in those ballots?

 

[CptTrips]

The best-known *proven* illegal voting or election-fraud cases tied to 2020 were generally small-scale and involved individuals rather than organized conspiracies. Politically, offenders came from multiple backgrounds; many cases had no clear partisan motive at all.

Some of the most widely reported examples:

* Barry Morphew — A Colorado man charged and later convicted for submitting a ballot in the name of his missing wife, who had previously been presumed dead. He publicly identified as conservative/Trump-supporting. ([Wikipedia][1])

* Bruce Bartman — A Pennsylvania Republican registered his deceased mother-in-law and voted in both her name and his dead mother’s name. He stated he wanted to “test” election security while supporting Donald Trump’s fraud claims. Republican affiliation was publicly documented. ([Wikipedia][1])

* Patricia and Mark McCloskey were *not* charged with voting fraud despite internet rumors; this became an example of misinformation spreading after 2020.

* Crystal Mason — Though her vote occurred in 2016, her case became nationally prominent during the 2020 fraud debate. She was not clearly acting for partisan reasons and believed she was eligible to vote.

* Several cases in Florida involved felons who misunderstood restoration-of-rights rules after Amendment 4. These generally were not tied to party activism and often involved confusion over eligibility. ([Wikipedia][1])

* Isolated non-citizen voting cases were prosecuted in several states, including recent federal cases in New Jersey involving votes cast in 2020–2024. These prosecutions usually did not identify meaningful partisan affiliation. ([AP News][2])

One broader statistical review found that among voter-fraud convictions from 2016–2020 where affiliation was known, roughly:

* 41% were Republicans
* 39% were Democrats
* the rest were independent/unaffiliated. ([A-Mark Foundation][3])

At the same time, many of the *largest and most famous allegations* after the election — Dominion machines switching votes, mass ballot dumps, dead voters changing outcomes, etc. — were investigated extensively and generally not substantiated in court or audits. Over 60 lawsuits challenging results failed or were withdrawn. ([Campaign Legal Center][4])

A separate category that became very prominent after 2020 involved the “fake elector” efforts in several swing states. Those cases were not about illegal voting by ordinary citizens, but about attempts to submit alternate electoral certificates after the election. The people involved were overwhelmingly aligned with the Republican Party and Trump campaign efforts. ([michigan.gov][5])

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud_in_the_United_States?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Electoral fraud in the United States"
[2]: https://apnews.com/article/ab1bfbc64be135d66a1908be5e6d3ede?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Four New Jersey residents charged with illegally voting and lying on citizenship forms"
[3]: https://archive.amarkfoundation.org/the2020election/voter-fraud-convictions-since-2016/?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Voter Fraud Convictions in the 2016-2020 Elections"
[4]: https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsuits-regarding-2020-elections?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections"
[5]: https://www.michigan.gov/ag/-/media/Project/Websites/AG/releases/2026/March/Report-Regarding-the-Prosecution-of-Michigans-2020-False-Slate-of-Presidential-Electors.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Report Regarding the Prosecution of Michigan's 2020 ..."

[Animl-AW]

My God you are out of touch. A small minority of Albertans want to separate. Quebec on the other hand... well....want to learn to speak French?

Well you’re trying to make sense to someone with horrific judgement skills. He’s proud to eat dirt, speaks for itself