The intelligent attack the criticism.. the rest attack the critic.
I know of no one in aviation that might rely on youtube or google for reliable data
When the critic has uses sarcasm as a mean to dismiss, you get what you deserved. The passive aggressive attempts to insult me and to bring my intelligence into question has not been missed, so consider yourself a hypocrite.
Google and Youtube has a massive amount of useful and reliable documentaries and learning materials that can all be cross referenced for validity if you so wish..
Google being a search engine is very capable of helping you find reliable data, and the fact you mention you know no-one in aviation that uses Google for reliable data, would help me to surmise you either don't know anyone in aviation or the people you do know are Luddites.
Nobody is dropping them out of helicopters either
Dr. Matthew Liao at the WEF.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is3QlfJZrFgYou guys should take some time to watch some WEF talks. These guys will give you hints at what they're going to be up to.
Look up Operation Sea-Spray if you think } would never experiment in plain sight.
If you want an explanation of the increased amount of metals in the atmosphere, look at all the starlink and other satellites that burn up in the atmosphere per year. That is a scientific fact.
I can't fault the Logic on that statement; Things that go up and burn, their combusted materials must come down eventually.