Author Topic: Gay TV II  (Read 1651 times)

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Gay TV II
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2002, 08:08:51 PM »
Very good Thrawn, very very good! I love the facist tie in, that gets a bonus. :)

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Gay TV II
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2002, 08:19:11 PM »
Thank you, I liked the iliteration myself.:)

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Gay TV II
« Reply #32 on: January 17, 2002, 09:07:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SOB



LOL..."they".  That's like making a judgement on the entirety of the heterosexual population by observing the few who shopped at that same adult book store.  I especially liked your observation of how those evil gays brought the scourge of HIV & AIDS down upon all of us poor innocent heterosexuals because of "their" evil lifestyle.

Remember how you were coming down on Mr Fish for his views on Jews, Udie?  Look in the mirror real quick.


SOB



 Hey I didn't say all of em.  But all the ones that went in that place were sick individuals.  I'm sure that alot of it was that at that time there weren't many places they could go to hang out....er.. meet together.   But this toejam I saw was squealing disgusting.  Any person who would pay a stranger %50 to suck his donut is sick.  Some of them would go back and wait for hours for "fresh meat" to come in.

 About mrfish, I already said my apolgies to him and admitted I was wrong for getting bent and he accepted the apology :).  Please don't get bent on me for something I think is gross.  I let them be.  I can't stand what they do but I have never tried to stop them except for the 1 guy who grabbed my arse.   Remember I do have some friends who are "that way"

 Ted Nugent put it best.

"Look if somebody wants to go dance around in a bucket of goat piss be my guest, just don't splash it on me" :D

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Gay TV II
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2002, 09:30:18 PM »
Quote
Any person who would pay a stranger %50 to suck his donut is sick.


Yep that's way too much.  Animal only charges $20.

Offline Animal

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5027
Gay TV II
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2002, 09:36:52 PM »
$25 if they look unhealthy.

Offline Udie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Gay TV II
« Reply #35 on: January 17, 2002, 09:37:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup


Yep that's way too much.  Animal only charges $20.



gotta love a slowing economy :D    eeeewwwwwww

Offline easymo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1640
Gay TV II
« Reply #36 on: January 17, 2002, 09:56:22 PM »
I keep getting flash backs, of the Monty Python guys drag racing.  Insensitive British nazies.

Offline AKSWulfe

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3812
Gay TV II
« Reply #37 on: January 17, 2002, 10:13:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
How's that?


I explained it in the paragraph where you got the sentence from.
-SW

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4298
      • Wait For It
Gay TV II
« Reply #38 on: January 18, 2002, 12:26:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Animal
OK, seriously now.

I dont know what the big deal is about all this gay fear. Its not a sickness. If you consider yourself straight, you shouldnt feel threatned by homosexuals at all (unless they try to rape you?)
I used to be prety critical of homsexuals before I worked at a restaurant in an area with high gay concentration.
I met a few homsexuals there. They are mostly normal people. They are not out there to corrupt your childrens mind or your own. They mostly want to be let alone.

We have hundreds of channels of our interest. Why cant gays have a channel for them to watch? Christ, its a damn pay channel, you dont get it unless you want to.



...can we please knock off the "fear" thing.  Just like "homophobe" is nothing more than a buzzword used by the gays and thier sympathizers to further thier agenda by pretending those on the "otherside" might really start to think they are afraid of Gays.  Not only that it attempts to put Gays in the position of superiority and it's quite honestly roadkill.

  Gays can have thier TV channel.  My children will NOT watch it.  I don't give a crap whether two people are gay or not, but my kids won't be while they live in MY house because I believe it is fundamentaly ...wierd.  I don't give a crap about whether johnny or jane have 2 mommies or 2 daddies.  I don't really care what anyone else wants to do, as long as they are happy and aren't disgusting about it...I really don't CARE, go marry your goat for all I care.  Really, the only "problem" I have with Gays is the men lol.  Man...I just can't figure out why anyone would want to go in through the out-door with EITHER sex....or Animal even.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5708
Gay TV II
« Reply #39 on: January 18, 2002, 12:41:37 AM »
Well that's better I guess.Only one personal attack and no blatantly offensive remarks.Might even get around to "agreeing to disagree". Perhaps this one wont get locked out...:D
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline Dinger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1705
Gay TV II
« Reply #40 on: January 18, 2002, 01:19:40 AM »
Once again folks, it's very simple.  You want to find openly gay folks, look for an environment where open homosexuals are accepted (not "tolerated", as was pointed out before).
But many gays don't live in those environments.  Some keep to themselves.  Others have trouble admitting their homosexuality to themselves.  Many of those repressed souls you can find at certain parks in your town, hanging out in the public restroom, meeting each other for a quickie.  It's sick, but that's the price of societal repression.
Look, I've seen a bit of the world, and I'm a little slow, so folks have tried more and less subtle ways of picking up on me.

(By slow I mean it took me three years to realize that when she let the nightgown fall open, she was coming on to me -- and I was interested in her)
So, sure, I've had men and women come on to me in various parts of the world.  I still haven't given in to the men yet.  But in my experience, the less accepting a culture is of homosexuality, the more intrusive and brazen those encounters are.
So in other words, the sordid stories I see here as excuses for why "we should keep them studmuffingots in their place" are justifications for perpetuating a system that is sick for both hetero- and homosexuals.  That for me is an illness we need to fight.
(and in case you're wondering, the extreme is a nation on the US list of sponsors of terrorism, where male homosexual behaviour is some sort of capital offense).

And yeah, there will always be "swingers" who are an insult to whatever sexual orientation they might have.
And a "sidewinder up the tailpipe" is about as much a part of male homosexual love as its heterosexual equivalent.  Sure I think about female genitalia all the time, but when I'm in love with a woman, sex is a small (but important) part of the equation.
If sex were the major reason, we'd all avail ourselves of prostitutes: they're cheaper for god's sake!

Oh yeah, and don't mix pedophiles in.  The Boy Scouts ban decent family-man homosexuals (like Robert Baden-Powell), but those spooky pedophiles always seem OK by their book.  Thankfully I was never the smallest, most lonesome boy in the troop.  Still I remember those campouts, where we heard from the Asst. TL's tent "Hey Steve, wanna see where the horse bit me?"
« Last Edit: January 18, 2002, 01:32:18 AM by Dinger »

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Gay TV II
« Reply #41 on: January 18, 2002, 01:42:48 AM »
Quote

If sex were the major reason, we'd all avail ourselves of prostitutes: they're cheaper for god's sake!


Man I need to keep this one as a quote, too bad CP's out ;)
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline mrsid2

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1081
Gay TV II
« Reply #42 on: January 18, 2002, 01:48:50 AM »
I'm pretty peeved with this issue..

The policy of the finnish national tv is not to send any explicit material. Only thing that comes out is very light erotic material.. You know, the kind that shows less tits than an average french family movie. Seriously :)

They used to show that soft stuff for some time, it was annoying, but I reckoned someone might find it entertaining.

Then the change came.. A new national subculture channel came.. They started to show erotic programs made for homosexuals. I was appaulled.

But that wasn't enough.. The other national channels (except the two controlled by the government) changed the soft porn to soft GAY porn! The only sexual oriented programs that come out in finland today are GAY programs!

How twisted to hell can that be???? If there weren't filmnet and TV1000 and ATV and ETV24 (which are all paid channels) it wouldn't be possible to see any straight erotica anywhere. I'm disgusted, the board in the channels must all be 'left handed.'

I'm ok with homosexuals as long as they don't bring their issues to my home. Unfortunately they do, and I don't have to like it.

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Gay TV II
« Reply #43 on: January 18, 2002, 04:18:40 AM »
Quote
For the most part it was civil, until Grunherz went off the handle because Wotan indirectly called him a homo... or his parents. Hell I forget which, either way it was funny as hell!


wasn't me mate

I so homophobic I was scared to post in such a gay thread that I may percieved as such.......:)

this threads gay to..........

people who identify themselves by there sexual acts should expect to people to call umm on it.

The loud flaming gay pride types wear their perverted behavior on thier sleeve and dare someone to call umm on it.

Homos have been around for years as long as they keep their sexual behavior to themselves who would care?

If they can earn a buck catering to 2-3% of the us population that is gay so be it (by statistic gays are concentrated around certain areas so in one community their percentage of the population maybe higher).

Alot of TV already is gay and I watch it rarely.

I find it hypocritical the people say we should see through thier behavior and view them as "persons" when they are the ones who define themselves by thier sexual acts.

We dont need to give "specialial rights status" to a sexual act.

Please keeop me out of all further "gay threads" makes my skin crawl...........:)

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
Gay TV II
« Reply #44 on: January 18, 2002, 05:40:01 AM »
Four years ago I supervised the "homosexual detail" at a county park. We achieved some notoriety, in that we arrested on the average of 30 homosexuals a week from an area of the park that was set aside for boyscout camping, and we had a high conviction rate using audio taped evidence. The operation was in response to complaints from the boy scouts, park management and people trying to enjoy the park with their kids. The charges were usually for exposure or simple battery (when a homosexual would "grab for the gold" on the undercover officer)

Many of you, Udie excepted, probably havn't seen much aggressive homosexual behavior. It is easy to take the high moral ground in support of homosexuality when it doesn't encroach on YOUR life.

I am not condemning all gay people for this. (You never see Lesbians cruising for instance) There are gay males who don't engage in this conduct. But many do.

See for yourself. Drive to secluded area of a large public park in an urban area at lunch time. When you pass a car driven by a lone male, watch in your rear view mirror. When he is past you, give a couple quick taps on your brake pedal. If you see a response from his brake lights, you have just made your first cruising contact. Drive slowly to a bathroom and park. When the other car arrives and parks, exit your vehicle and walk slowly into the bathroom and wait. Your boyfriend will arrive shortly. When you become attuned to this, you will be astonished at what is going on around you.
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century