Author Topic: AH vs Photorealism [img]  (Read 449 times)

Offline Gnappo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
      • http://digilander.iol.it/gnappoah/
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« on: February 01, 2001, 10:13:00 AM »
Check these img

                 


               

what is a real mc202's photo??        


more pic in my site

     ¸·´¯`·¸¸·Gnappo·¸¸·´¯`·¸
1° Gruppo Caccia "Asso di Bastoni"
 http://digilander.iol.it/gnappoah/




[This message has been edited by Gnappo (edited 02-01-2001).]

Offline 1776

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
      • http://Iain'tgotno.com
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2001, 10:20:00 AM »
The real one is the one with the readio and the frame counter  

Offline SFRT - Frenchy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5420
      • http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2001, 12:58:00 PM »
They both fake  
202 is a legend, like the snowman in Tibet.

[This message has been edited by SFRT - Frenchy (edited 02-01-2001).]
Dat jugs bro.

Terror flieger since 1941.
------------------------

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2001, 01:02:00 PM »
Hey Gnappo, what frame rate do you get when flying in that terrain?

It would be very cool to fly in such scenery!

AKSeaWulfe

  • Guest
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2001, 01:50:00 PM »
Tac, it would be much the same as the current terrain you are flying over. The only difference is the detail of the textures being used. They have no real impact on framerate, unless you don't use any then you'd get a good FPS boost. Otherwise, they will be about the same as you're getting right now.
-SW

Offline Gnappo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
      • http://digilander.iol.it/gnappoah/
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2001, 03:58:00 PM »
pot eht si revsna thgir eht  

The legendes will never die!

202 RULEZ!! (like the Yeti)



------------------
      ¸·´¯`·¸_
¸·´¯`Gnappo´¯`·¸_¸·´¯`·¸

1° Gruppo Caccia "Asso di Bastoni"
 http://digilander.iol.it/gnappoah/

sky_bax

  • Guest
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2001, 07:07:00 PM »
THIEF!!!!!  

he he  

 http://agw.dogfighter.com/agw//Forum3/HTML/017376.html

Here are the ones I did a month ago.  




------------------
Skybax
328th Fighter Squadron
 www.352ndFighterGroup.com
Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2001, 11:17:00 PM »
The real C.202 camo seems to be a deep yellow (a little orange??) against Aces High C.202.

but it can say that Aces High graphics is close to real photo.  

[This message has been edited by Mitsu (edited 02-01-2001).]

funked

  • Guest
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2001, 11:31:00 PM »
Mitsu I think the error may be in the photograph actually.  I have seen the C200 at the USAF Museum which was restored by Macchi, and the paint sure looks like the color of the AH plane.

Offline Gnappo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
      • http://digilander.iol.it/gnappoah/
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2001, 05:02:00 AM »
Mitsu you can ckeck variosus 202's camo here

 http://www.amivirtual.com/MC202color.htm

perhaps the original 202's camo was a yellow a bit darker: this is a restored 205

   


------------------
¸·´¯`·¸_¸·´¯`Gnappo´¯`·¸_¸·´¯`·¸

1° Gruppo Caccia "Asso di Bastoni"
 http://digilander.iol.it/gnappoah/

[This message has been edited by Gnappo (edited 02-02-2001).]

sky_bax

  • Guest
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2001, 11:24:00 AM »
Ok, I admit it, you all got me itching to make a Macchi shot.

 

Follow the link above in my last post, the image is in there.

------------------
Skybax
328th Fighter Squadron
 www.352ndFighterGroup.com
Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney


[This message has been edited by sky_bax (edited 02-02-2001).]

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2001, 11:30:00 AM »
Here's one without a photo realistic background..just plain old real code from AH...

 

funked

  • Guest
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2001, 11:53:00 AM »
Actually, Gnappo's second shot is in AH too.
With AH you don't need to superimpose models from a vaporware future version of the game on photos.  You can just take screenshots.  

sky_bax

  • Guest
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2001, 11:59:00 AM »
Holy cow you guys ARE touchy.

It`s O.....K, just sim planes on backgrounds.

Sheez....... get a grip.

Nice pic Gnappo.  



Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
AH vs Photorealism [img]
« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2001, 12:12:00 PM »
Hey Sky-Bax, we're not touchy, just passionate!

BTW< Loved your pics with WB3 and photo-realistic photos, very nice!