Author Topic: damage model suggestion (Read 406 times)

MANDOBLE · « **Reply #15 on:** January 23, 2002, 04:01:52 AM »

ROFLOL, estos no tienen Ñ en el teclado, en lugar de coño tiene que poner vagina ....

DarkglamJG52 · « **Reply #16 on:** January 23, 2002, 04:54:49 AM »

Les pedimos demasiado. Contar mentalmente y aprender a usar sinónimos

no está alcance de todos. A si que lo de meter un mapa de caracteres nuevo en el Windows o buscar caracteres especiales en el Word puede considerarse un master en ciencias informáticas en este caso.

AKDejaVu · « **Reply #17 on:** January 23, 2002, 07:40:29 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by DaLadyzMon
Enough is Enough -

since I am a fairly mature 19 year old, and I serve in the military. I don't see anything wrong with using my nickname as my handle and my signature being where I currently attend school.

LOL! Here's a bit of advice...

Save this little gem and look at it again in 11 years.

AKDejaVu

K West · « **Reply #18 on:** January 23, 2002, 08:31:20 AM »

Dear horde o'mighty.

The MA comes to the UBB.

popeye · « **Reply #19 on:** January 23, 2002, 10:03:02 AM »

Discos, lockups, power failures, Important Conversations with the wife, and surprise attacks by small children are adequate simulations of mechanical failures. No need to program them into the code.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled flame fest....

Zippatuh · « **Reply #20 on:** January 23, 2002, 10:28:16 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKDejaVu
And.. btw... you're going to want to lose the "DaLadyzMon" handle. The spelling combined with the use of "USAF Academy" in your sig make you the gayest man posting on this board.. with the possible exception of animal.

LOL, good one. Thanks for the laugh it was great. Hell, I’m still laughing at it. Self proclaimed Casanovas from the academy are gonna get a lot of respect, lmao.

Oh, and, I agree with Popeye. Add in dog’s barking to get in or out, window’s update alarms, firewall alarms, the phone, and answering the door adds enough mechanical failure.

Zippatuh

deSelys · « **Reply #21 on:** January 23, 2002, 10:34:24 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKDejaVu
Someone gets shot down by an N1K2, they come here and complain.

Someone sees someone warp and prevent them from killing them and they come here and whine.

Someone discos and they come here and whine.

Someone is in a fight that they thought was unfair and they come here and whine....

You forgot to add that in every case, you feel necessary to add your grain of salt in those threads...hence the 5.000+ posts...

(AKDejaVu is a pretty good whine-counter

)

OTOH, I don't reject the idea for the events or the CT...but I have to admit that I would be pretty p!ssed off if serious mechanical problems happen to me twice in a row during a TOD....(I would probably rush to this BB to whine furiously about it then).

Master · « **Reply #22 on:** January 23, 2002, 11:11:25 AM »

i think they should add the mechanical failur as an option to select or unselect in the setup. that way those of us who want more realism can turn it on and those who dont can turn it off. also for events the option can be forced into play or forced off.

also i would love to see a way to selfdmg your plane via a dot command. like .kill left aileron or .kill engine .kill pilot wounded. this would be good for practicing emergency menuvers offline before you even get online where they are needed and used every hour

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #23 on:** January 23, 2002, 11:22:28 AM »

I get enough discos to account for "mechanical failure", I don't need the game to do it for me- my ISP is already prepared to produce the results you desire.

Oh and Master, you are a good troller. Have you considered changing your name to "Master Baiter"?
-SW

Master · « **Reply #24 on:** January 23, 2002, 11:33:29 AM »

lol, have two different accounts MasterJS and BaiterJS

Swoop · « **Reply #25 on:** January 23, 2002, 01:08:27 PM »

mrfish · « **Reply #26 on:** January 23, 2002, 01:14:38 PM »

mechanical failure is a fine idea. it happened in reality, why not here.

you dont want it modelled because it is inconvenient??

no wonder there are so many la7 up.

hblair · « **Reply #27 on:** January 23, 2002, 01:29:23 PM »

This is just asking for problems. There would be big time arguments/whines over whether Focke-Wulfes or Grumman manufactured planes were more succeptible to this or that. "But this plane had that field mod which made it more prone to this failure, blah blah blah".

Interesting idea, but waay too much work for the payoff IMO.

lazs2 · « **Reply #28 on:** January 23, 2002, 01:59:06 PM »

Does this new damage model use a roulette wheel or maybe just a dart board? I like the game to remain more skill than luck tho.
lazs

funkedup · « **Reply #29 on:** January 23, 2002, 02:07:22 PM »

Discos do a great job of simulating mechanical failure.