Mock me all you want, at least I'm not foolish enough to support a liar and crook.
Nope, I supported his right to privacy in regards to boffing Manlicka Blowinski, not his administration.
Seems pretty much the same to me, given Bill's seeming inability to tell the truth about anything. For all your moral outrage of Bush, I can't recall your dressing the past administration down for the fundraising violations they committed in the '96 campaign (you know, phone calls from federal offices, renting the Lincoln bedroom, hitting a monk temple for cash).
Now I for one would still say I would call for impeachment of Bush if he could be proven guilty of a crime. He hasn't. Until that time I support him. The innuendo and biased reporting you have provided so far reads like a Rush Limbaugh editorial- slanted to the left, of course. I haven't seen anything that sheds light on anything this or past administrations have done as a matter of course. You can pretend this isn't so, but I don't agree with you.
Anyway, what you are focused on here is an idealogical difference in your political viewpoint. You can't or won't see how Bush policies and initiatives might be in the best interests of the country because you have your own ideas. Great. But, instead of saying "he is wrong", you have to lace every reference to Bush with venom, and insult the intelligence of everyone that supports him. I am not deluded, I disagree with you. That is not a crime.
