Author Topic: Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?  (Read 1338 times)

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?
« Reply #45 on: February 01, 2002, 11:30:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort

I would trust a man of God before I'd ever trust a gay teacher teaching my children about accepting homosexuality.  


i wouldn't trust any "man of god" within a mile of my kids! there's never been a bigger front for pedophiles than the church.

if you really think those priests want to give up on sex and go live celibately with a bunch of other men for the rest of their lives .....please.... they need to just admit they are gay and get on with their lives.

libs are too relativistic, unrealistic and wishy washy. conservatives are too simplistic, plebian and easily led.

what a boring couple of choices.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?
« Reply #46 on: February 01, 2002, 11:32:46 AM »
Both sides are wrong.

Using 'free' in an odd way here.

Free pr0n, free guns, free ammo, hunting licenses on your enemy, free booze, and free drugs.

Everything paid for by the hunting licenses.

That's the way to build a society. Screw equality and toejam.

Offline Krusher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
Re: Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?
« Reply #47 on: February 01, 2002, 12:11:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
1. Someone like Charleston Heston, with monomaniaical support of guns above all else, publishes a "How to" book on killing federal agents and grossly mis-states other's positions.


hmmm I think you have Heston confused with someone else. He does represent the NRA, but he has not written any books on how to kill agents. I checked google and yahoo and saw nothing about this.

Now as to his monomanaiical support of guns, I dont see how this would make him a nazi.... they banned guns in the hands of private citizens.

since someone already pointed out that R.Regan never made any laws (thats congress) I would only add that you might want to research your trolls a bit more before posting.

btw I also think that Falwell is a bit out of touch with reality.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18207
Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?
« Reply #48 on: February 01, 2002, 12:23:02 PM »
mrfish

did you have a bad experience as an altar boy or something? :)
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Ralph Wiggums

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?
« Reply #49 on: February 01, 2002, 12:42:50 PM »
My cat's breath smells like cat food.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Who's the bigger "conservative nazi"?
« Reply #50 on: February 01, 2002, 05:59:04 PM »
Guys, I was reaching with Heston.  I was very tired and in a hurry.

Besides, I support the right to bear arms.  I just think that the vocal anti-gun people and the vocal pro-gun people are all morons.

Anti-gun wacko: "Duh, guns kills people, it because of guns  da murder rate so high in da US.  Lookit da guys in Columbine, dey used guns.  Dat proves guns is bad and need be banned"

Pro-gun wacko: "Nu-uh, knives kill just as good as guns.  If guns ain't available people would just do da same wit knives.  Lookit dat mom in Texas, she kilt her kids wit a knife.  Dat proves knives is just as deadly!"

Lets see, no guns don't kill people.  Guns are not the reason that the murder rate is so high in the US.

Hmm, nope, knives are not as easy to kill with, there is a reason the modern militaries of the world us guns instead of knives and swords.

No single, or few, example(s) means jack toejam in this context.  Both sides are lying through their teeth to make it seem they are completely correct and their opposition is evil.  If they actually believe the crap they say they're idiots.

_____________________________ ____________________

As far as the War on Drugs goes.  Dems and Repubs are both fully responsible in my opinion and both guilty of the transgressions against the US Constitution.  Look at Bush and Gore's statements regarding drugs in the 2000 campaign.  Can you tell a difference?  I can't.

I don't think that Reagan caused the hostages to be held in Iran any longer than nessacary.  I think those charges are as bogus as the rape accusations against Clinton.  I think Clinton and Reagan are both guilty of perjury, Clinton just got caught.

_____________________________ ____________________

I made a mistake in my post about religion.

I said "Preach on the street corner, in church, in your home, in the wilderness, ect but do not expect the Government to press your religion on others for you."

The truth is you should be allowed to pray anywhere you want.  Anywhere.  If anybody says you can't they are wrong.  If one of your children comes home and says a teacher told them they couldn't pray at school, that teacher was wrong (I'll see if I can find the relevant ruling later).  Children are completely free to pray at school, they are completely free to gather in a prayer group.  They are not allowed to lead the school body in a prayer over the PA system because that has the appearance of the school backing that one faith.

The "Teaching about Islam" that was (is?) being don here in CA is absolutely outrageous because of how it was being done.  Classes covering major religions are fine, but not when they have children "role-play" praying in a faith's fashion.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2002, 06:01:12 PM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-