I am recommending a new system to perk planes in AH. I like many, (some, or just maybe myself! LOL) would like the perking system to be made more objective than it appears to be
The system should be, the higher the score, the more likely the plane is to be perked, and the more perk points the plane will cost.
1. Does the plane have gull wings? If Yes 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
2. Is the plane blue? If yes 5 pts
3 Is the plane faster than a G10? If yes 10pts (subtract 9 if LW)
4 Does the plane have 20 mm guns? If yest 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
5 Does the plane have Hispanos? If yes 10 pts
6 Will the plane outturn a Dora? If yes 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
7 Does the plane have better acceleration than a Dora? If yes 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
8 Does the plane roll better than a Dora? If yes 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
8 Is the plane American or British? If yes 10 pts (subtract 9 if LW) Just to be fair
9 Does the name start with Spit, Cors, LA or YAK? If yes 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
10 Is it easy to fly for a newcomer? If yes 5 pts (subtract 4 if LW)
See how easy it is to be objective?
Lets see, now a Spit9, 5 pts for 20mm guns, 10 for Hispanos, 5 cause it can out turn a Dora, 5 because it outrolls a Dora, 10 pts for being (heaven forbid) Britsh, 5 pts because the name starts with Spit. And it is easy for newcomers to fly 5 pts. That is 45 pts! Compare that to a Dora with only -8 pts for a 'Dora!
And some people want to perk the Dora and not the Spit!
Those ignorant Spit dweebs, flying uber planes! When here we have a objective mathematical process to PROVE the Spit should be perked!
I have tried to be fair and balanced, however, I am sure some will feel that this system may be a bit too biased in favor of Allied iron, but you can't please everyone!
Just trying to add some fairness to the perk system.
AKEagle+
