Author Topic: Suggestion: New 6-view system  (Read 1112 times)

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #30 on: February 28, 2002, 05:54:36 PM »
A couple of questions:
Don't ejection seats have 'reel tensioners' to tighten the harness automatically before an ejection? Or do high performance fighter pilots (F-15,16, and 18 drivers) fly with the straps tight?

HiTech. Just out of curiosity, how would you compare the idea of 'Padlock' in game to how you look around during a dogfight? Not trying to open a separate can of worms here, but just curious on how you would compare the two.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #31 on: February 28, 2002, 06:15:41 PM »
But HT...
your neck is 1.4 times the human norm in length...

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12375
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #32 on: February 28, 2002, 07:19:44 PM »
Sundog: I have nothing against padlock. As far as realistic or not its realy a moot point, it's just an automatic function for somthing you do automaticly already. You realy don't have to think how to turn your head.

On a presonal note I think it can be a hinderance when fighting more than one person.

The problems come in when trying to implent the non lock and reaquire parts, this can be very unrealistic, for instance how do you implement a padalock system where a plane going under your nose for a bit can make you loose him? Im always open to suggestions on this. What im dead set agains is a padlock system finding a bogie for you when you can't see it, or require him when he gets hidden then comes back into view, because these can be dificault to do in real life.

As far as cable reals, they are common today, but were not in WWII.

Offline Hooligan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #33 on: February 28, 2002, 07:28:41 PM »
Thanks for the long explanation HT.  That was really interesting.  

Hooligan

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #34 on: March 01, 2002, 12:23:44 AM »
Thanks HT. I agree that I find it easier to use the hat views when fighting because it allows me to maintain SA. I was just wondering on many of the arguments (Which you addressed) regarding it's realism. I agree completely that it shouldn't be a pseudo RADAR tracking system. I have seen some implemented REALLY well and others rather poorly. Thanks.

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2002, 03:32:51 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
Im always open to suggestions on this


Opening a thread for suggestions on that.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #36 on: March 01, 2002, 09:27:56 AM »
HT.. I really enjoyed your explanation.   for a number of reasons.

Oh.. mirrors were used a lot and American planes didn't "vibrate" and pilots were  likely to smash their face on the dash in a bad landing because they forgot to tighten up their straps.   Anyone who wants a more resricted/harder to achieve six view is a gutless pansy or/and a LW guy.  
lazs

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #37 on: March 01, 2002, 09:43:08 AM »
edit

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Suggestion: New 6-view system
« Reply #38 on: March 01, 2002, 02:20:25 PM »
I believe ripsnore has outdone himself on the "content/sig" ratio.
lazs