Author Topic: Loser, couple fps screenshots u wanted (Read 504 times)

whels · « **on:** February 27, 2002, 05:21:08 PM »

here are the 2 screenshots u wanted.
both were in 1280 32bits res.

whels

loser · « **Reply #1 on:** February 27, 2002, 09:09:50 PM »

you get 200fps for a red x? sweet

whels · « **Reply #2 on:** February 27, 2002, 09:50:31 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by loser
you get 200fps for a red x? sweet

hmm wonder why some see the pics, and some cant.

whels

Animal · « **Reply #3 on:** February 27, 2002, 10:32:59 PM »

i see em
what video card?

how many you get in a big vulch with lots of flying thru smoke

Mitsu · « **Reply #4 on:** February 28, 2002, 02:33:55 AM »

animal watch whel's post carefully lol

Seeker · « **Reply #5 on:** February 28, 2002, 05:24:16 AM »

"hmm wonder why some see the pics, and some cant. "

If you're using IE 6, it's related to cookies/security settings. Look down at the status bar, and click the little red stop sign (if shown); click over ride automatic settings and accpt the two yahoo cookies and the pix show.

As an aside...... pix no longer need remote hosting, they can be uploaded directly to the BBS using the attatchment feature.

Wotan · « **Reply #6 on:** February 28, 2002, 08:51:22 AM »

Seeker is correct.........

whels · « **Reply #7 on:** February 28, 2002, 10:46:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Animal
i see em
what video card?

how many you get in a big vulch with lots of flying thru smoke

Video is Gainward GF3 TI200 OCed to 230/500 (about TI500 level)

about 40fps on a full smoked large field

but then i never vulch, looks up to watch for lightning strike.

whels

Am0n · « **Reply #8 on:** February 28, 2002, 12:38:56 PM »

Strange i have a radeon 8500 with newest drivers which beats my friends system whos video adapter is a TI500 in 3dmark 2000.

you get frames almost 2X as high as me with a O/C TI200? strangely enough hes got the same CPU as you and more ram.

something sounds odd about that.

Am0n · « **Reply #9 on:** February 28, 2002, 12:44:04 PM »

DOWT!!!

disregaurd that last post, just noted that you were running 1280x1024x32, i play in 1600x1200x32. I'll have to downgrade the res and see if theres that big of a difference.

id still keep it in 1600x1200 simply because i still get a constant 75-80 fps.

Exile · « **Reply #10 on:** February 28, 2002, 01:00:08 PM »

Alot of people have VSync turned on and so FPS depends on the monitor refresh rate. My monitor can only reach 75 hertz at 1600 and so the max fps I can get is 75.

Turn VSync off and watch your FPS soar.

whels · « **Reply #11 on:** February 28, 2002, 01:25:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Am0n
Strange i have a radeon 8500 with newest drivers which beats my friends system whos video adapter is a TI500 in 3dmark 2000.

you get frames almost 2X as high as me with a O/C TI200? strangely enough hes got the same CPU as you and more ram.

something sounds odd about that.

my 3dmark2001 and 2001se score is 7400

whels

Am0n · « **Reply #12 on:** February 28, 2002, 01:37:46 PM »

Exile, good idea but i have a 21' hitachi that can refresh 120 hz @ 1600x1200, (or 160 @ 1280x1024) i dont see vsync being much of a problem.

Whels im going to be getting 3dmark2001 tonight off my bro so i'll see what happens with that.

In 3dmark2000 last i ran it i scored 8192 3dmarks.

Animal · « **Reply #13 on:** February 28, 2002, 01:40:31 PM »

You never vulch?
Why have a high end gaming PC then
Why do you play AH at all

whels · « **Reply #14 on:** February 28, 2002, 02:05:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Am0n
Exile, good idea but i have a 21' hitachi that can refresh 120 hz @ 1600x1200, (or 160 @ 1280x1024) i dont see vsync being much of a problem.

Whels im going to be getting 3dmark2001 tonight off my bro so i'll see what happens with that.

In 3dmark2000 last i ran it i scored 8192 3dmarks.

i just loaded up 3dmark 2000 v1.1 and got
a score of 10,760.

whels