Author Topic: aces  (Read 1635 times)

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
aces
« Reply #45 on: May 27, 2000, 07:39:00 AM »
Hehh..
Time to have my trip to Estonia...
You know that country which Soviet union occupied 17.June 1940 and which get back its freedom in August 1991 ?
Of course russians send lots of Estonian people to Siber to work in salt mines...

so there were countries which fight for their own freedom... Some of them succeeded, some not. Estonian Army had only about 15000 men and russians send over 25000 to invade... wtg...

That might be one reason I hate "GangBangers"  

You can see I'm very patriotic but I'm not a Nazi so if it come to your mind forget it just now  

[This message has been edited by Staga (edited 05-27-2000).]

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
aces
« Reply #46 on: May 27, 2000, 01:20:00 PM »
I agree totally with you Staga on the Russian issue. The Easternfront did get twisted in a weird way and the more I read about the FINs (thz for showing me this) I was very impressed. History shows Stalin was more of a world tyrant than Hitler was. Anyone that opposed repression in my heart is a hero. Soviet Union was kicked out of League of Nations. The choice was the lesser of two evils. Stage I must admit things would have been very interesting if the Allies did support Finland<S>. Boggles the mind how some Russians still feel Stalin was a savior when his purges of their Force certainly cause major defeats.


"Many LW flyers were deeply anti-nazi.
Many LW flyers (Rudel between them) were convinced nazi party members.
But hey were skillful and I admire that skill. If some of them were nazi pigs I don’t like that, but I still admire their acts"


Ram that denial clause you apply to the LW pilots is very weak. I really don’t care about their personally opinions. They participated in the Nazi regime activities, they took orders from the Nazi party hence they are Nazi. Your lame excuse for them insults the intelligence of the free world. I don’t care if they were fighter pilots escorting bombers to Denmark to terrorize and kill civilians, or sowing buttons on SS uniform in Germany.



"The German team played with inadequate players and continuous tactical disadvantage. Start a soccer match between F.C. Barcelona and a second division soccer team with a 0-5 score favoring the second. Who will win?...nothing to do with the "best skilled" but with the "best advantage". Radar, English Channel and inadequate German planes gave that advantage to British.
And they still RAF was on the edge of losing the battle.”

                                                                     

RAM, interesting to see how this analogy would apply to the attacks on Denmark, Norway, Greece and Belgium.

Lets not also forget that Germany had been planning WAR aggression for many years. The Allies were scrambling to catch-up. Compare flight time hours for pilots of both sides of the BOB. This compounded with the numbers superiority puts your German tactical disadvantage to rest.


"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few."



[This message has been edited by Torque (edited 05-27-2000).]

Offline Minotaur

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
aces
« Reply #47 on: May 27, 2000, 01:29:00 PM »
Wow...

------------------
Mino
The Wrecking Crew

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
aces
« Reply #48 on: May 27, 2000, 02:32:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Torque:

Ram that denial clause you apply to the LW pilots is very weak. I really don’t care about their personally opinions. They participated in the Nazi regime activities, they took orders from the Nazi party hence they are Nazi. Your lame excuse for them insults the intelligence of the free world. I don’t care if they were fighter pilots escorting bombers to Denmark to terrorize and kill civilians, or sowing buttons on SS uniform in Germany.
Of course if in your country somehow a Nazi party raises to the power and start a war, and call you to files, you'll surely say "no" and let you be shot because insubordination.I am quite sure you would, eh?. And you wouldn't follow an order from your superiors because the high command was nazi. YEs pretty sure you wouldn't.


And you are telling me that Allied pilots were assasins and SOBs because they escorted bomber missions to Japan...missions that consisted on dropping thousands of tons over civilians...or what about Dresden mission pilots?...they were ALL ASSESINS!! isnt it? both bombers and their escorts. Of course. Thats why Harris and LeMay were included in
Nurenberg trials and judged for "crimes against the humanity" huh?...or did they were considered as national heros?...ummm maybe i need my memory pills here!!

You say I am insulting people and world's intelligence! Then What are you doing?! EH? tell me, were allied crews of bombers over Japan and Germany ASSASINS!? WAR CRIMINALS!? they followed terror bombing orders. Should they have REFUSED to follow the orders? REALLY?.

NO THEY WERENT. Harris and LEmay were criminals, yes, but the ones who followed the orders werent. Escorting crews on Dresden adn HAmburg bombing werent assasins, too. And LW pilots werent, for the same reasons. Nor soviet ones, neither.

It is incredible how has war developed. 5 centuries ago if a Feudal Boss made war to another, raped his women, burnt his fields and killed his servers, but let the Feudal enemy boss alive, without eyes and tongue, he was seen as an example of clemency.

Once century ago British troops beaten a hole country because his emperor didnt want British to drug his citizens (CHina opium war). That was seen as an "war of example".

In World War two, at the start, Blenheim bombers didnt dare to drop their bombs over the pocked battleships anchored there because they feared to kill civilians. three years later they were dropping hell over Hamburg three days and nights in a row.

In 1944 and 45 thousands of American B29s destroyed 95% tokyo with low level bombings because a General decided that precision bombing (his job) was too difficult because jet stream. So he killed millions of civilians instead.

Terror bombing and Nazi acts werent only in german side, torque. ANd you know it. You are saying that I insult people's intelligece saying I admire people's acts regardless of their ideology.
you are insulting MY intelligence and using demagogy here. I didnt expect that from you, Torque I thought you were an intelligent and decent guy.

 
Quote

"The German team played with inadequate players and continuous tactical disadvantage. Start a soccer match between F.C. Barcelona and a second division soccer team with a 0-5 score favoring the second. Who will win?...nothing to do with the "best skilled" but with the "best advantage". Radar, English Channel and inadequate German planes gave that advantage to British.
And they still RAF was on the edge of losing the battle.”

                                                                     

RAM, interesting to see how this analogy would apply to the attacks on Denmark, Norway, Greece and Belgium.
[/b]

Attacks on Denmark Greece and Belgium endired less than one month of the ENTIRE war.And over Denmark there weren't even air battles AT ALL! Norway had heavy RAF support, and was a difficult task for Germany. Tell me how many kills got hartmann over Greece?.And MOelders? NOwotny? Galland? Bär? Rall? tell me torque. NONE of them scored in those campaigns. (I consider BElgium as France campaign)
 
Quote

Lets not also forget that Germany had been planning WAR aggression for many years. The Allies were scrambling to catch-up. Compare flight time hours for pilots of both sides of the BOB. This compounded with the numbers superiority puts your German tactical disadvantage to rest.


yes they were preparing for war for years. Hitler was. But his country was regarded by his advisors that wouldnt be ready until 1944 to a war against France. That answers all to your states avobe.

And avobe "my" German tactical disadvantage at rest, is not a rest, is my POINT!. Since the start I said that LW had better pilots over Britain than RAF had. Because experience, because training because ANYTHING. at that moment they were best pilots than RAF's PERIOD!

So you give me the reason.

 
Quote
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few."

That was the only intelligent and non insulting statement in your post. ANd that says all about it.

Offline jmccaul

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
aces
« Reply #49 on: May 27, 2000, 06:50:00 PM »
What if's are pointless as in real life you will find that every moment the smallest elementary particle makes a descision and as such the universe splits - this happens to every particle as such we have an almost infinite (but not) number of different universes - this is the multiverse theory.

Why is it relevant? well the LW obviously made tactical errors during the BoB. Stating that if the LW made no tactical errors they would have won the BoB which is frankly ludicrous idea. The fact is the LW met for the first time a well trained enemy with equal aircraft capabilities and lost for host of reasons despite their numerical superiority if you take away these reasons it is easy to say well then they would have won but as you take away the reasons the LW didn't win you completley change the enviroment of the engagement and as such you have a completley different set of reasons why the LW lost or won.      

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
aces
« Reply #50 on: May 27, 2000, 07:05:00 PM »
                                                                                                                                                                                 Of course if in your country somehow a Nazi party raises to the power and start a war, and call you to files, you'll surely say "no" and let you be shot because insubordination.I am quite sure you would, eh?. And you wouldn't follow an order from your superiors because the high command was nazi. YEs pretty sure you wouldn't.

Not sure if I read you right on this but
Who would stay in such a country or support such a political platform for that type of occurrence to arise. That’s a very big and long”somehow” Doesn’t happen overnight.



And you are telling me that Allied pilots were assasins and SOBs because they escorted bomber missions to Japan...missions that consisted on dropping thousands of tons over civilians...or what about Dresden mission pilots?...they were ALL ASSESINS!! isnt it? both bombers and their escorts. Of course. Thats why Harris and LeMay were included in
Nurenberg trials and judged for "crimes against the humanity" huh?...or did they were considered as national heros?...ummm maybe i need my memory pills here!!


You need to remember Ram who started the war.
It was the only way and weapon with which the Allies could defeat them at the time. The Germans started it, and they were only reaping what they had sown.

How can one compare the Allied bombing campaign to the German? Germany was bombing civilians to pursue world domination and enslavement. The Allies bombed to shorten War and to save countless numbers of lives. The citizens of the allied countries didn’t appreciate sending their children to die on foreign soil. Bombing Japan and German civilians would end the War sooner and stop a lot of unnecessary death and destruction. The allies just did a better job, having being taught by the Germans in 39



In 1944 and 45 thousands of American B29s destroyed 95% tokyo with low level bombings because a General decided that precision bombing (his job) was too difficult because jet stream. So he killed millions of civilians instead.


Americans suffered heavily in the Pacific-Island Theatre in 45. Bombing to save American GIs on the ground. Japan could have surrendered at any point. American loses were projected to be in the 100 000s if they invaded Japan. The reason the Japanese suffered was not the Allies fault. They just wanted to get the War over quickly and with minimal lose of life.


You are saying that I insult people's intelligece saying I admire people's acts regardless of their ideology.
you are insulting MY intelligence and using demagogy


No it was the “I didn’t like the party but I went for the ride anyhow” flavor. I said they were all Nazi regardless. The demagogy you refer to is history.



[This message has been edited by Torque (edited 05-27-2000).]

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
aces
« Reply #51 on: May 28, 2000, 07:02:00 AM »
I find incredible that, after seen many times that History is the best teacher, some of us still refuse to learn from it...or simply ignored it.

 
Quote
Originally posted by Torque:
                                                                                                                                     
Not sure if I read you right on this but
Who would stay in such a country or support such a political platform for that type of occurrence to arise. That’s a very big and long”somehow” Doesn’t happen overnight.

Who would stay?. You. Me. Everybody. Or are austrians letting everything and going from their country because an ex-SS is now in the power????. Would you sell everything and go to another country where you know noone and it is a new life for you?(and see if inmigration lets you go in it)?. I mighty doubt it.

And about the "big and long somehow. dont happen overnight"...well I guess that in 1928 when in REichstag Nazi party was a 5% that was a long somehow, too.

And when Spanish Nationalists started the 1936 rebellion they never thought that Franco would put a 35 year fascist dictatorship...

And what about Austria? 6 months ago WHO would've told that Hayder, an Ex-SS would raise to power?...and THAT HAPPENED OVERNIGHT!

You feel too comfortable, Torque. These kind of things happens by surprise because NOONE thinks they are possible. And they are. May God protect us, but thery are PROBABLE. Maybe not in your country but yes in other's

 
Quote

You need to remember Ram who started the war.
It was the only way and weapon with which the Allies could defeat them at the time. The Germans started it, and they were only reaping what they had sown.

How can one compare the Allied bombing campaign to the German? Germany was bombing civilians to pursue world domination and enslavement. The Allies bombed to shorten War and to save countless numbers of lives. The citizens of the allied countries didn’t appreciate sending their children to die on foreign soil. Bombing Japan and German civilians would end the War sooner and stop a lot of unnecessary death and destruction. The allies just did a better job, having being taught by the Germans in 39



Heh...yes I know that argument and excuse me, from my point of view is pure S$$t. So if your nighbour comes with a shotgun and fires to your wife and kills her you get a shotgun and move to your neighbour's house and shot her wife?...that is the argument hiding in your answer "they did it before so we could do it too". Sorry Torque the world doesnt work that way. If american pilots made terror bombing they werent more innocent than the German pilots that did it before. And the High COmmand that ordered those bombings were EXACTLY same guilty than the other's one. You say that American people suffered bad in 1945. Sure. That is a war, Torque, is suffering. But if you say that german pilots were assassins and war criminals because they followed terror bombings orders in first war year, then I say that american pilots bombing Japan in 1944 and 45 were exactly same guilts (IMHO none of both were. High commands were,not pilots). There is no redemption is "they did it first". So dont hide behind that argument, is worth nothing.

 
Quote

No it was the “I didn’t like the party but I went for the ride anyhow” flavor. I said they were all Nazi regardless. The demagogy you refer to is history.

Some were nazi. A lot weren't. YOu dont have to think as your government to take the weapons and figth for your country. Tell me Torque ,in Gulf War EVERY and ALL of US soldiers were REpublicans?. because Bush was republican and sent them there. Were republicans because they follow orders of a republican president?. No.

Same with Germans. German Army had still a lot of influence from Prussian army. Prussian army was and iron-one. it impulsed obbey and following orders over anything, torque. And German generals were raged against hitler. And they still obeyed them because their career and militar oath told it clearly "to obey superior's orders". That was an honour oath, and germans took it until death. Many disagreed with Hitler's orders and political views. Still they obeyed. They were officers and they HAD to do it.

Still in 1944 there was a BIG plot against Hitler. I am sure I am not wrong if I say that 80% German high officers knew about it. and some 40% supported it, giving active support to the plot. Only Nazi-convinced officers and SS officers were let apart. 80% torque. 80% non-nazi officers. And they payed a high tribute.

Still that wasnt my previous point. If a Nazi pig like Rudel killed a battleship, two cruisers ,several destroyers, 500 tanks. 2000 vehicles and countless enemy's lives, I have to admire that kind of skill, regardless of his ideology. He was skillful and I admire the Skill not the man.

If you dont see the difference is not my problem. Still, I want you to understand it.


[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 05-28-2000).]

JENG

  • Guest
aces
« Reply #52 on: May 28, 2000, 09:25:00 PM »
Sigh how did this topic go from a quizpop question, to which country had the best pilots, to a political debate about the rights and wrongs of WW2?

How can you compare pilots, aces? You just can't. I admire alot of famous pilots and it doesn't matter if they are/were German, British, American, Japanese, Italian, Russian, Finnish, etc, etc. Even if you disconsider different tactical methods, places of flying, length of TOD's or lack of, different planes, personal kill saldo,etc you just can't pit one ace against another and say well this one is the best. They were all different people with a certain mix of talent, coolness of character and maybe above all luck.  

Then you guys start throwing in little pieces of 'historic fact' that tends to support your own personal opinion and think that this will convince the other guy of your views. Of course not cause the other guy just throws in his own little fact, etc, etc. The BOB just doesn't tell anything bout which ace was better. Even tho it was an airbattle, and it was the 'finest hour' tactical and strategic elements were so much more important that it's just plain stupid to prove your case on this battle.

Then it all turns into something political.

Ram says that 80% of the LW pilots weren't nazi's. That's stupid. People got caught up in the war and adjusted. If Germany had won I don't think Galland would be the notorious anti-nazi, good buddy of allied aces we now know. Hell had Germany won I would have spoken German and if not a nazi would have shud up and adjusted cause if I did not I would have been send to work as forced laborer or maybe even in the camps. (talk about a nightmare).

Then you 2 go on bout warcrimes and little boy. Torque talks about the A-bomb saving lives. Of course it did but that's not the whole story (little fact to prove torque's case). Just some little bits of info (that btw don't prove a thing)1) Truman wasn't elected into office as president. 2) Truman knew about Sovjet intentions in the far east (just look at what happened in E-Europe). If you realy want to prove a case do some research, have fun the next 10 years  

Realy guys you are not getting anywhere. Ram you still 'bite' to soon... unhook it bro

Torque you sometimes have the effect of a fox in the chickencoop...  

You guys both have different backgrounds and opinions... that's the way it should be... just leave it at that.

'Preachermode' out.

Bee


Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
aces
« Reply #53 on: May 29, 2000, 05:07:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by JENG:
Ram says that 80% of the LW pilots weren't nazi's. That's stupid. People got caught up in the war and adjusted. If Germany had won I don't think Galland would be the notorious anti-nazi, good buddy of allied aces we now know. Hell had Germany won I would have spoken German and if not a nazi would have shud up and adjusted cause if I did not I would have been send to work as forced laborer or maybe even in the camps. (talk about a nightmare).
No, Bee. I say 80% of Wehrmatch High Officers in 1944 knew about the plot against Hitler, and 40% supported it actively. The other 40% remained silent because, although they agreed that Hitler was leading Germany to destruction, some didnt want to be part of a confabulation to kill a superior, some didnt dare to try to kill hitler...but they still remained silent. The other 40% payed a high tribute because the plot.
I doubt any nazi would have supported, or hidden the plot.


 
Quote
Then you 2 go on bout warcrimes and little boy. Torque talks about the A-bomb saving lives.
I dont know if he talks about tha A-bomb...but I dont. During 1944-45 several Japanese cities were erased from the surface of earth, with comventional bombings, at a stage when even the philippines werent retaken tokyo was 60% destroyed by incendiary bombs.
THe reason to bomb civilians in their cities wasnt to save American army people until after Owinawa had happened. IT was that american USAAF had to bomb Japanese factories like they did in Germany...but B29s couldnt bomb from high altitude because the Jet stream made the bombing unaccurate.
So the "hero" Curtiss LeMay, did the same choice as did Harris in Europe. "I cant do my job and do successful raids over the enemy war machine. SO I'LL KILL THEIR CIVILIAN'S INSTEAD".
"SIR" Richard Harris was a monster that menaced with resignation when his superiors wanted to shift from Zone bombing to precision Bombing. British HC stepped backwards and Harris remained in command of Bomber command until the end of war. He was seen as an hero, when he was responsible of the death of hundreds of thousands, millions of people.

"MR" Curtiss E. LeMay was the chief of the US bomber force in the Pacific. When he saw that the efforts to do precision bombing were too big, he realiced he couldnt to his job well...SO he shifted to cities. He was responsible of th death of millions of Japanese people. HE was seen as an hero and he commanded the SAC after the war.

"MR" Douglas McArthut, in Korean war, when he was in a big hurry,asked permission to launch an A-bomb over North Korea because he didnt dare to do his job and lose the war (and the prestige that he was putting him on the road of the White House). Gratefully, UN and USA denied him the permission and dismissed him AT ONCE.

Etc etc etc...as you see Nazis were monsters...but "some" other people...what was?.

I dont like to be given the answer "they did it first". As I said if someone grabs a shotgun and kills your wife, he goes to jail. If you take a Shotgun and kill the man's wife you go to Jail. in WWII Allied monsters didnt "go to the jail"but were regarded as heros.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
aces
« Reply #54 on: May 29, 2000, 07:51:00 AM »
The difference, RAM, is that the allied commanders were fighting for a just cause. 20,000 people died every day in WW2, any method of shortening the war helped to save lives.
Bomber Harris may have been wrong in his belief that bombing alone could end the war, but it was what he sincerly believed. He knew that when the war was won it would bring an end to mass killing. German "heroes" knew that if they won the war the people of the occup[ied countries would go on to pay with their lives.
Hitlers policies towards Jews and others were well known. The atrocities comitted on the Eastern Front were well known to Germans.
A man like Galland, in his senior position, must have been aware of the extent of slave labour used in Germany. Did he never visit a factory on his inspection tours? Yet he carried on fighting for a completly evil cause.
RAM, if you kill a man's wife because he killed yours, that is called revenge. If you have to kill a man and his family to stop him killing thousands of others then that can be justified, if there is no other way.
For what it's worth, I think the greatest heroes the LW produced were the Ju88 nightfighter crew who contacted British intelligence and defected to Britain with their plane. They risked their lives for the right cause.
RAM, you talk about the plot on Hitler's life. That did not happen until it looked like Germany was going to lose the war. Those German officers sought to spare Germany the horrors of invasion. If they had done the same when they were busy invading Russia nad other countries, and murdering millions of people, then I would consider them non-Nazis.
Remember RAM, Fascists are not all the same. Nazi Germany was far, far worse than Franco's regime in Spain. Franco, like all dictators, persecuted people he thought were a danger to him. Hitler perrsecuted millions of people, not because they were a threat to him or Germany, but simply out of hatred. A man who supported Franco was not nesecarily evil, one who supported Hitler was.

JENG

  • Guest
aces
« Reply #55 on: May 29, 2000, 09:28:00 AM »
Fact is... history is written by the victor... If Germany had won the war guys like 'Bomber' Harris and LeMay would be convicted warcriminals... I'm just glad it was Goring standing trial in Nuremberg and not Harris... cause otherwise I would be speaking German  

War is hell but like nashwan said... certain actions are a necessary evil... I know you think the same way.

Bee

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
aces
« Reply #56 on: May 29, 2000, 10:44:00 AM »
Nash, Bee. I can see your points...more or less. But come on, and lets get real. What did Dresden bombing for the allied victory?.
WHat did Hamburg bombing? What Berlin Night bombings?...

the answer is-nothing-.

They were done because revenge on London bombings by Luftwaffe in 1940 (and as long as I know the first"bombing" was an error). When Harris saw that if he was going to bomb by day would cause big loses then he chose to bomb by night. And Churchill aproved it.
That is called today "war criminals".

Germans started? yes. Germans did horrible things? yes. Germans were war criminals? nearly all the high command, yes.

Does that allow the other side to act as war criminals? no. No,no and no.

In Japan the same story. Shangai rapes, Death march of prisoners, Medical experiments, barbarian acts...whatever.

Still 90% tokyo was wiped out in bombings done because USAAF wasnt able to bomb the factories. What good did that for victory? none. A-bombs did, and I havent mentioned here in all the thread. That was a terrible decision that costed some 300000 lifes but saved millions. Tokyo bombings costed thousand of lifes and saved...NONE!

If today a bad guy gets a Colt 45 and fires to an old lady with all his rounds and then starts to run, if a policeman kills him he will be proccessed as 1st degree murder. In 1945 not only they werent processed, they were promoted and treated as heros.

Bee..."vae victis",yes. I am too proud that WWII ended with allied victory. But I know that many civilians died with no use. Dresden, Hamburg, Tokyo, Osaka, Berlin...that was a grave of millions of civilians, ded because revenge?. I feel sick only thinking in that excuse. War would have been won without that assasin raids. (note that I mess with zone bombings,not precision bombing. Day raids over Berlin to destroy factories were legitim. night ones to destroy lifes werent).


About the plot...there were more plots tried in 1942 and 43, when the war wasnt that clearly lost by Germany...but I dont mind that. and I dont mind that because to start the plot, Nash, those German officers (many of them heros of war) had to break something sacred for them...the honour oath of the german officer and the Prussian rules that said to follow the superior's order till the end. That plot was insubordination, something simply innaceptable for a prussian officer. And they still did it. And died for it.

And yes I am quite sure that Galland, Guderian, etc knew about slavery used in factories. But I am quite sure that they had no idea of what was going on in concentration and extermination camps, nor the jew holocaust.

but that can be said better by a German,not by a Spanish dweeb.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
aces
« Reply #57 on: May 29, 2000, 11:43:00 AM »
RAM, RAF night bombing was done to attack the civilian population, who were engaged in war production. The bombs and shells and bullets the German forces used, the planes and tanks and submarines they fought in, were all made by the civillians who lived in those cities that were bombed. Dresden, with hindsight, was one bombing too many, but the raids on Hamburg and Berlin and all the others were justified because of the damage they did to the German war machine.
Killing people after the war was over would have been revenge. When these raids were carried out the war wasn't over. Even if many of them were carried out after victory was certain, the war was still very far from over.
The American bombing of Japan was carried out before the atomic bombs were ready for use. There was no guaranty those bombs would work properly, or at all. The supply of bombs was limited. Without the nukes, bombing would have defeated Japan anyway, so it was morally right. There is big difference between using every means at your disposal to win the war and persecuting innocent people out of pure hatred.
 
Quote
If today a bad guy gets a Colt 45 and fires to an old lady with all his rounds and then starts to run, if a policeman kills him he will be proccessed as 1st degree murder. In 1945 not only they werent processed, they were promoted and treated as heros
Probably not in America  
Seriously though, the point in law is if you are certain that the man is running away only to attack someone else, then you can still shoot. The Germans were not going to stop killing people, they were retreating and firing as they went. It is a big difference RAM.

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
aces
« Reply #58 on: May 29, 2000, 12:06:00 PM »
I cant disagree more...so now civilians are legitim targets for militar operations? then why in Gulf war was there som many noise when that bunker was bombed with 200 civilians inside???..

Civilian people cant be bombed because they WORK in a factory to earn the bread to feed they children!!! damnit that is an assasination!!!!!


But okay you consider civilians as legitimate war targets. Tell me what industry was there at dresden?. any? none.

Look, they bombed Dresden only to put terror on retreating forces. They came in a wave, bombed the city and then waited for hours for people go to the streets and thing all was over. Then they came again by surprise and bombed the civilians, refugees and even American war prisoners on the streets. They bombed first with fragmentation bombs and even some penetration to damage the water network and then they came with incendiary weapons tio put everything on fire.

When the second wave was over, then came the third, even worse. The city was a big burning wreck by then. They bombed it with thousands people in the streets, and the esxorting planes even dived to straffe people on the streets.

Dresden, the "German Florence", had no industry and was an unstrategical target.

Harris ordered that attack. Churchill gave the go ahead.

And they weren't criminals.Yah, they were heros.

Sorry I am really getting sick.


Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
aces
« Reply #59 on: May 29, 2000, 12:14:00 PM »
An BTW, night bombing on Berlin did cause negligible damage to the factories there. Thats why American bombers had to bomb it by day in 1944.

And Hamburg was JUST like dresden. THey bombed it just to make clear they could do it. THe bombing happened during 3 days and 3 nights, in following waves. USAAF bombers tried to restrict their bombings to the railyard but as they could see nothing thru the smoke and the raging firestorm over HAmburg, they simply threw the load of bombs over the city as they couldnt aim anywhere.

Yah...heros.