I have a question. Perhaps it is a stupid question, but it has me sort of confused.
I was under the impression that to get your rank (in a certain category) you took all the sub-categories, added up your place in them, and the lowest overall number would be ranked number 1, say for fighters. I don't think that is the case, or if it is then something is terribly wrong with the ranking system because that doesn't seem to work. Ok, I'm a score potato, I admit it. Actually, I just think it is a really cool way to keep track of improvement, along with how you stand beside your peers. I was checking my score tonight (#12 overall, WTG me!

)- and I came across some , well, odd things.
For the Fighter category, I am ranked #51. The first place guy is, as of the moment I checked it, a fellow named "Rotty". I checked each subcategory ranking (since it is there now

), and something wierd comes up. I don't think this guy should be ranked number 1.
Me: ranked 51st
Kills / Deaths + 1: 3.1484 (101)
Kills / Sorties: 1.8769 (82)
Kills / Time online: 0.0016 (393)
Hit percentage: 14.92% (38)
Points: 24733.9429 (182)
I understand my stats are not particularly spectacular, I'm posting them to compare them with the number 1 spot.
Rotty: Ranked 1st
Kills / Deaths + 1: 2.1944 (218)
Kills / Sorties: 1.4630 (176)
Kills / Time online: 0.0014 (603)
Hit percentage: 9.16% (238)
Points: 61028.4404 (15)
If we did it the way I thought it was done, his 'total' comes up to 1,250. My total comes up to 796. Shouldn't I be ranked ahead of him since the 'total' of my ranks is lower than the total of his ranks? Is this where that base capture bug comes into play at?
Make sure I have everything right, I read that in another post a while back (how the scoring was calculated), so I may have messed it up. It is kinda puzzling though.