Author Topic: A new Russian Fighter for AH  (Read 1312 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #30 on: April 06, 2002, 06:30:52 PM »
:)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #31 on: August 02, 2002, 04:39:41 AM »
Punt

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #32 on: August 02, 2002, 01:07:48 PM »
Ah I missed a biplane thread! ;) :D

Yes bring on the I-16  and of course the I-153!

Gloster Gladiator,
Cr.42,
I-153,
& Hs-123
would all be very usefull fighters/divebombers(Hs-123).
Imagine dogfighting in a val, 2x the armament, manuverability & all of them are faster than the val other then the Hs-123 which is only 15-20 mph slower but could carry 20mm cannons! & around the same bomb load.

I've damadged & shot many ppl down with vals & SBD's so I'm not worryin about them not being used in the MA, and I'm not that good a pilot just look at my scores :D lol.

They will definitly be usefull in scenarios as well, especially now that we are getting early war slow planes like the SBD&val we already have, & a stuka wich i sense not too far away :) .

And they definitly served a great role as far as history goes,

Gladiators were very widly used, even the first to enage enemy bombers in the BOB, & was extreemly manuverable, just imagine flying a val, with much better roll & turn rate, 2x the armament, 10-15 mph faster. only disadvatage would be it couldnt carry bombs, or many anyway.
More Cr.42's were made than almost if not any other italian fighter!
I-153 would definitly be usefull, top speed of 275 mph, rockets,bombs, retractable gear, and 4x7.7mm MG's, & was even produced at a higher rate than the I-16 during ww2, infact in mongolia the I-16 was replaced by the much more manuverable I-153.  I've allso read, that even though it was a biplane it had surprisingly good acceleration rate, and both the I-16 & I-153 didnt have drag flaps!

Hey brady, don't you guys at the CT staff get to suggest planes to HTC? :D
« Last Edit: August 02, 2002, 01:19:21 PM by cajun »

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #33 on: August 02, 2002, 05:52:57 PM »
No, unfortunatly we do not, only beg like the mortals we are:)

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #34 on: August 02, 2002, 07:07:39 PM »
If we can add that crap we can add this to :

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #35 on: August 02, 2002, 11:34:57 PM »
Hey brady, post this one on a bill board near Htc's office :D

Offline whgates3

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #36 on: August 03, 2002, 01:15:19 PM »
Cajun, you left Avia B.534 off your list of WWII biplane fighters

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #37 on: August 03, 2002, 06:45:15 PM »
OMG, what a thought we all get to gether and save up and get a HUGE Billboard sign that Pyro pases on the way o work each day and Put up a Pick of the Plane we want added with a caption"Pyro, We Want this".

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #38 on: August 04, 2002, 01:22:39 AM »
NoNo, "President Pyro" :D

I have some good & bad news for biplane guys:

Bad news:
A friend of mine asked HT if they would add biplanes & he said he doesnt like biplanes :(

Good news:
1: A lot of the CT staff want biplanes as well, daddog said he would suggest them :)
2: Pyro is the one who choses the planes not HT :D ;)

I will be gone for 2weeks, so to brady & Dr.Z, & my squaddies I award you with the temporary rank of #1 in command of the biplane beggers! untill I get back of course ;) :D

PS. whgates don't know much about that plane, could you post some info about it?
« Last Edit: August 04, 2002, 01:36:30 AM by cajun »

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #39 on: October 20, 2002, 04:45:05 AM »
puntski

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #40 on: October 20, 2002, 05:32:51 AM »
Definatly need some early war VVS stuff. What I want more (less needed) is a Yak 3 though! :D
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #41 on: October 29, 2002, 03:25:10 AM »
Wil compare the yak 3 to the yak 9u, the yak3 wouldnt add much.......

Offline ike2k2

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #42 on: October 29, 2002, 04:37:43 AM »
RE:

We need Soviet fighters that actually suck  

What we have now is all monsters..

Yak-9U: darn fast, good maneuverability...
Yak-9T: reasonably fast, killer guns...
La-5FN: amazingly capable plane
La-7: amazing upgrade from the amazingly capable plane

.....

We need some 1941, 1942 stuff! It's shame to see none of our AH VVS planes have the typical "Soviet green" colors on themselves!!


LaGG-3 and Yak-1B(in Lilya Litvjak colors!!! ooooh!!!)

... these two come into mind.


__________________

"It's the machine, not the man" - materialist, and proud of it!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

my response

add the MiG-1, 3, and the polikarpov I-16 on the suck list

Offline Fancy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 294
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #43 on: October 29, 2002, 11:37:54 AM »
Awwww....it's sooo cuuuute

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
A new Russian Fighter for AH
« Reply #44 on: October 29, 2002, 01:45:10 PM »
hmm, ,my sources tell me the Polarkov is an WW1 fighter...
am I mistaken?