Nuchpatrick, there are quite a few players who would like to have another Zero, myself included. Just because you have difficulty getting kills in it doesn't mean it's an impossible task. Why have an early P-38?(not to be anal, but we don't have a "PJ" in AH and the L used the same GE B-33 turbos as all H-5 and later variants except the one-off K model) Yes, the J-25 and L were the best of the bunch but that doesn't mean the F through J-20 models were completely useless. If we're going to use that logic then why have the D-11 and D-25 Jugs? The D-30 climbs better and carries more ordnance. Why have any 109 but the G10, or any 190 but the D9? The earlier models of these planes give MA players more choices in what they have to fly and I can't see that as a bad thing. They are also useful in scenarios and in the CT where it's nice to have an actual 1942 variant for a 1942 setup rather than substituting a 1944 variant in its place simply because the 42 model isn't available.
This whole "perk prop" issue has been discussed before and I'm not so sure it would be as simple as some think. Don't get me wrong, I love P-47s and fly them quite often, but if we allow field retrofits for the Jugs then they should be available for every other plane as well. I know a few 38 drivers who would love to have the kit installed that allowed a pair of 2,000lb bombs to be loaded. Luftwaffe fans would be frothing at the mouth to get even a small portion of the retrofits that were used on their rides. The time it would take for HTC to research and implement those changes would not be insignificant and I'd rather see them spend it modeling new aircraft for the IJN/IJA and RA which are sorely under-represented. Our three Jug variants by themselves equal the number of Japanese fighters modeled in AH and exceed by one the total number of Italian planes we have.
As much as I'd like to have a P-38G or a paddle blade razorback Jug, I can wait until they fill out the Japanese and Italian planesets a bit.
HTC: More IJN/IJA and RA planes please!