This is the same woman who offered to give The Saudi crown prince a blow job for $10,000,000 or something like that.
McKinniy is no dumb ass. She certainly knows what she's doing. If we look back at Dec. 7th, 1941 we can see how people can go back, and find "evidence" in the historic records which shows that FDR should have known about the attack on Pearl. The problem is that this evidence is usually found using massive ammounts of time and energy to go over the available intel resourses. Time and energy that was not available prior to the attack.
Does anyone have any idea how much intel we collect? I've worked in Intel, and studied it in college, but I still don't have an accurate grasp of the sheer amount of information that comes in for analysis. I'm willing to bet that at some point during the last several years, some information has crossed a desk or two that points at this attack. And after several years of second guessing someone will be able to "Prove" that the administration should have known. I think that McKinny is starting this way too early, but maybe she's already got her hands on something. Sooner or later a Democrat is going to win the political lottery by being the first successfull critic of the Bush Administration (Post Sept 11th that is). Daschle started too early and there was a backlash. No McKinny steps up to the plate. Sould be interesting to watch.
[edit] Lastly, there should be an investigation into the events prior to the attack. But the motive is all wrong here in my opinion. We need to find out WHY we missed it. There seems to be an assumtion that IF we missed it, it was because of curroption. Anyone who's done ANY analysis should know that there are countless ways this can get messed up
-Sikboy
