Author Topic: Boomerang  (Read 343 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Boomerang
« on: May 01, 2002, 01:01:55 PM »
Well what about a CAC Boomerang:) I mean after we get all those Japanese planes we desperatly nead:) Because so far we only have one early war Japanese ftr to fight off all those early war alled plane's.

C.A.C. Boomerang
TYPE: Single seat fighter / army cooperation aircraft
ENGINE: One Pratt & Whitney R-1830-S3C4 Twin Wasp piston engine, of 1,200 hp.
DIMENSIONS:
SPAN: 36 ft 0 in / 10.97 m.
LENGTH: 25 ft 6 in / 7.77 m.
HEIGHT: 10 ft 6 in / 3.20 m.
PERFORMANCE:
MAX. SPEED; 265 kts / 491 kph
CRUISING SPEED: 165 kts / 305 kph
INITIAL CLIMB: 2,150 ft / 655 m. per min.
NORMAL RANGE: 808 nm / 1,496 km.
MAX. RANGE (with drop tank): 1,390 NM / 2,575 km
SERVICE CEILING: 34,000 ft / 10,363 m.
ARMAMENT: 2x 30 mm cannon and 4x .303 in. machine guns in wings; provision for 4x 20 lb / 9 kg smoke bombs under centre section.
WEIGHTS:
EMPTY WEIGHT: 5,373 lb / 2,437 kg
NORMAL LOADED: 7,699 lb / 3,492 kg
MAX. OVERLOAD: 8,249 lb / 3,742 kg
CREW: 1
RAAF SERVICE: 1942-1946
with 2 OTU, and 4, 5, 83, 84 and 85 Squadrons.
With the sudden and apparently unstoppable spread of Japan from 1941, Australia found itself with no modern fighters with which to defend itself. The CAC (Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation) Boomerang was a panic measure, progressing from design to first flight in a mere two months, and using as many components of the Wirraway (itself a Texan/Harvard derivative) as possible.
The first CA-12 Boomerang flew in May 1942, with 2 Operational Training Unit taking the first deliveries the following October. By then the desperate need for the aircraft had passed with the arrival of P-40 Kittyhawks and Spitfires.
The Boomerang was flown by two squadrons in Australia (83 and 85) and 4, 5 and 84 Sqns. in operations against the Japanese. It was an inadequate fighter, but proved itself in the army co-operation role in New Guinea and Bougainville.
A total of 250 were built, as CA-12, CA-13, CA-19 and CA-14/A versions, the last being a turbocharged variant which appeared in 1943.
Three surviving Boomerangs were listed on the Australian civil aircraft register in mid-2001.

Offline Weave

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 343
Boomerang
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2002, 02:23:46 PM »
Nice looking plane. Can you imagine the plumbing nightmare routing all those exhust stacks out the same side like that? Bet it had an awsome sound to it.:)

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Boomerang
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2002, 11:39:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Weave
Nice looking plane. Can you imagine the plumbing nightmare routing all those exhust stacks out the same side like that? Bet it had an awsome sound to it.:)


It's not a plumbing nightmare. It's just a flame difuser set on a single stack. Think a long pipe with lots of small holes and extrusions to allow the exhaust gasses to spread out.

BTW the Boomerang is the venerable AT6 Texan up-engined and guns added with a single cockpit instead of the training double cockpit. Nice expediant way of getting at least some firepower forward without developing a new airframe.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
Boomerang
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2002, 02:51:40 PM »
hell yeah. we should get the AT-6, the Wirraway and the Boomerang. Since they all originate from the first mentioned, they shouldn't be too hard to develop.

Offline steely07

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1863
Boomerang
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2002, 08:30:57 PM »
Bring some Australian (markings/squad) Aircraft to Aces High.
 Agreed Brady :)
Aces High, Wing Commander, Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group: www.dickweedhbg.com

FSO Films : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFs6CAXBQoVBctljybD65fA?view_as=subscriber

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Boomerang
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2002, 03:46:43 AM »
I'd trade in the Boomerang for a RAAF marked Spitfire MkVIII, P-40N, B-24, or a Beaufighter!

 Tronsky
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Boomerang
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2002, 04:15:56 AM »
/:)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Boomerang
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2003, 11:24:19 PM »
It Should be Noted that the Aramement was 20mm Hispano's and 303's not a 30mm gun.

Offline LJbomber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Boomerang
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2003, 01:35:22 AM »
All the stuff i read up on indicated 2 X30mm, To change the set up would decrease the weight right? Altering performance in its favour some?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Boomerang
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2003, 02:23:35 AM »
LJbomber,

It was armed exactly like the Spitfire Mk Vb.  It carried two 20mm Hispano cannon (not sure if they were drum fed Mk Is or belt fed Mk IIs) and four .303 calibre Browning machine guns.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline LJbomber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Boomerang
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2003, 02:56:36 AM »
is a 303 a 7.9 mm?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Boomerang
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2003, 02:39:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LJbomber
is a 303 a 7.9 mm?

'Bout 7.7mm
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
Boomerang
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2003, 02:51:18 PM »
Hi LJbomber,

>is a 303 a 7.9 mm?

1 inch = 25.4 mm

(That's the official definition :-)

So a 0.303" gun is a 7.70 mm gun. A 0.30" gun is a 7.62 mm gun.

(These might be nominal calibres, often the actual calibre deviates slightly. It's subject to a certain inaccuracy anyway.)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline LJbomber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Boomerang
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2003, 10:44:36 PM »
Ok thanks for that guy, Also What about the boomerang wouldn't it be fun? Id fly it even if it does have great weakness's

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Boomerang
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2003, 12:01:11 AM »
I would like to see it, a Wiraway would be cool to:)