Originally posted by gofaster
The Merlin provided an increase in power (as in speed). The Allison was notorious for being underpowered given its weight. The Allison-powered P-40s also used exposed rivets in the fuselage construction, which created all sorts of drag problems compared to the smooth-skinned Mustang and later P-40s. I would expect that, in the MA, the high-alt performance drop-off would cause a lot of players to drop the P-40 in favor of faster airplanes or planes with a better bomb load-out (the Mustang comes to mind). Comparing the P-40E to the P-51B, the Mustang _should_ be faster in level flight (even though both would have the same engine) and has the ability to carry 2 bombs instead of the P-40E's ability to carry just one. Both the P-40E and P-51B should have six .50 calibre guns (I believe the P-51B had 4 in the wings and 2 under the nose, but please correct me if I'm wrong).
So, in a nutshell, if you don't like the P-51B, you may not like the P-40E. The real question is how well the P-40E will turn and how much damage it will be able to take. When it was introduced in Air Warrior, those two factors were the main reasons I flew the P-40 in low-alt furballs: it packed a wallop and could take two or three hits from lucky snapshots. Its performance was pretty average otherwise.
Typically, the Allison engine installation weighed less than the Merlin XX, not more. I can give specifics when I get home this evening. Furthermore, all P-40 aircraft were constructed using flush rivets, not round head rivets.
Finally, the Allison powered Mustangs were the P-51, P-51A and A-36. Why was the P-51A faster than the P-40? Look at the radiator ducting for that answer. It incorporated Meredeth Effect theory to generate positive thrust by harnessing the heated and expanding air from the radiator core. Some minor gains may be the result of the laminar flow wing, but even Lee Atwood (headed P-51 design team) thought that 99% of the speed gain was do to using "thrust augmentation" from the ducting.
I expect that the P-40E will be slightly more effective in the MA than the Ki-61. Note that the Ki-61 is a rather capable fighter when handled correctly, a clear match for the N1K2 in everything but steady state climb. Remember the initial howls about the "uberness" Bf 110G-2 when it first arrived? Expect worse when the P-40 shows up, as it will prove to be a terrific low level fighter (under 15k).
My regards,
Widewing