Author Topic: Just some suggestions for 1.09  (Read 911 times)

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Just some suggestions for 1.09
« Reply #30 on: November 17, 2001, 12:36:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak:
Pongo,

The T34/85 is, IMHO, the bottom end perk tank.

The T34/76, M4A3 Sherman abd Panzer IV H are all roughly competitive with eachother and could all be used.  If the T34/85 were free, the M4A3 and PnZ IV H would only be useful in scenarios really.

That's the way I see it at least.

I think lots of people would agree with you.And it is a near thing based on how accuratly they are modeled.
I feel that if the optics and gun power of the IVH are modeled correctly combined with the AA machine gun makes the T34/85 and Pz IVH comparable in value in the game.
Each can kill or be killed by the other with about the same effect. The Panzer has the AAMG and the T/34 has speed.
I hope the US base line tank is a M4a3-75. Excellent HE performance and armour and speed both better then the panzer, close to equivelent to the T34/85. 50Cal on the roof is a big advantage here vs the other two though.
Then you have a Panther as an expensive perk
A M4A3E8 76 as a medium perk and an IS2m as an expensive perk.
Any of this would need some more improvement in the modeling of armour damage effects. And some refinement to the traveling on the move capability.

The T34/85 might have a lower eny value then the Pz IVH. But it isnt a perk tank. If you model the T34/76 then you have to introduce some way to show that the gunner and the comander were the same man. Maybe force the transition from commander to gunner to 4 seconds...?

Offline empire2

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 252
      • http://www.marineairwingah.homestead.com/HomePage.html
Just some suggestions for 1.09
« Reply #31 on: November 19, 2001, 05:08:00 PM »
something else i really want is a ju-87 stukawith its 2 huge cannons that would be the best  :D
I diddlyING LOVE ACES HIGH

Offline empire2

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 252
      • http://www.marineairwingah.homestead.com/HomePage.html
Just some suggestions for 1.09
« Reply #32 on: June 05, 2002, 07:00:11 PM »
ok back october 23 2001...or...back to the ...Meteor...i want it in 1.10 please...if not please get it in 1.11
I diddlyING LOVE ACES HIGH

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
Just some suggestions for 1.09
« Reply #33 on: June 05, 2002, 10:10:03 PM »
That thing didnt even see action in WW2 I dont think.... We need Gloster Gladiator, CR42, I-153, Hs-123, Fairey Swordfish and Maybe a Stuka, but ONLY if the biplanes are added too :D:D

Offline cajun

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
Just some suggestions for 1.09
« Reply #34 on: June 05, 2002, 10:19:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by empire2
yes but if you get too many gladiators(or even biplanes for the matter)wouldnt you die very easy...plus getting outran by every chase.i know biplanes are cool  :cool: but hey think of how little hp they have...in a 190 you could kill a gladiator in 2 secnds  :rolleyes: just think about it  :p


Not really, Biplanes would be very usefull in AH.
They Outmanuver in general ANY other plane in Aces High, sure you can go faster in a 190 but if u get on their tail there is no way you can stay on it over 2 seconds, They can out turn a zero and the gloster gladiator can out roll a 190!.
And if your answer is you can just run away from em... well thats true but the objective is to shoot the other guy down :D

And look at the D3A1 (10 MPH slower than Gloster Gladiator), SBD-5 (same speed as Gloster Gladiator) and A6m2 (only 15-20MPH faster than CR42).

And imagine how usefull they would be to up at a vulched feild, Escourt bombers, and in the hs-123 & I-153's case dive bomb.

And planes such as Gloster Gladiator (saw combat untill 1943),
Hs-123 (saw combat untill 1944) and the FaireySword fish wich was used through out the entire war were used a great deal.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2002, 10:22:52 PM by cajun »