and the Whiner is.........
banana
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 3429
Buffing: Why bother?
After spending over two hours last night to earn one lousy bomber perk point, I'm beginning to wonder if it's worthwhile to even attempt to buff in the MA anymore.
It takes 60 bomber perks to get to fly the lowest perked bomber, the AR-234. I currently have 9.62 bomber perks. I've been buffing for over 6 years in WB and AH combined, so while I'm not the best buffer by far, I at least know my way around them and am fairly competent. But when you consider the amount of time an average bomber sortie takes compared to a fighter sortie, accruing bomber perks take a much longer time compared to fighter perks.
And when you consider that a buff is easy meat for all but the most inexperienced of fighter pilots, once a buff pilot encounters an enemy fighter, he/she has about an 80% chance of dying shortly thereafter.
HTC, IMO, caved in to the "Anti-buff" crowd like Lazs and his ilk by moving the strat targets 40 miles behind the front lines, and changing the configuration of the airfields so that buffers have to spend an inordinate amount of time over a field, increasing the exposure time for buffers.
Fine. I can live with that. But at the very least, I would like to ask HTC to bump up the ENY values for all buffs to something more equitable, that would allow the buffers to accrue points at relatively the same rate at which fighter points accrue. Either that or how about reducing the AR234's perk value to 20, or something more fair. At the rate I'm going, it'll take me another 6 months to get 60 bomber perks. If I were to go for just fighter perks in that same time, I know I could get three times that many points in the same amount of time.
How about throwing the bomber fans a bone or two?