Originally posted by Sikboy
An interesting note on the Swordfish...
It seems to me that the success enjoyed by the Swordfish relied heavily on their being the only Aircraft around. I know that they were unopposed during the Bizmarck fight, does anyone know if there was any fighter opposition during Taranto? I have a feeling that the Swordfish might get blown out in AH, since there isn't much opportunity for surprise attacks. It's very nice to see that our current planeset is fairly well stocked though
-Sikboy
Swordfish earned magnific reputation because it was a stable and capable plane able to fly in the most adverse conditions imaginable. However, as a torpedo bomber against credible opposition, it stood no chance.
The highlights of the Fairey Swordfishes were.....
1- torpedoing of the "bismarck"... happened because
a) swordfishes flew off the Victorious and Ark Royal in the worse of the sea states...which says quite a lot about their ability as carrier planes
b) Bismarck had no air cover.
c) 50% of bismarck 4.1in AA was misguided by a POS fire director

2- The Taranto attack...that success happened because
a) was a night ,unexpected raid. No oposition met from enemy aircraft
b) Italian Plugliese TDS (torpedo defence system) was full of toejam, one 18' torpedo being able to make severe damage to 35k ton ships.
THose were hte highlights on the Swordfish career, but you must note there was no air opposition at all during those actions... The first time the Swordfishes had to attack a target covered by enemy air oposition (Scharnhorst, Gneisenau and Prinz Eugen, during the channel Dash in February 1942), they were butchered and wiped out of the skies, plain and simple.
In fact the Swordfish was way more important during WWII as CVE planes than what they were in those two actions. They gave a magnific service against U-boats on the battle of the Atlantic, being able to fly off the tiny carrier's decks on the most extreme circunstances.
But they were dogmeat for enemy fighters, plain and simple.