Author Topic: Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...  (Read 544 times)

Offline FDutchmn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1114
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2002, 11:44:07 PM »
RoyofCA, ya trolling again? :D

Really, I say this for the following reasons:

1. If you really wanted this fixed, you would get a film of it, e-mailed it to the support desk or posted a thread on the BUG Report Forum (for the purpose of this forum is not to report bugs)

2. Posting such a message here is asking for responses in the nature of my reason 3. :D

3. If you had enough perk points to get an Me262, then you must have enough experience to take off manually.  Taking off under the automatic take off feature without getting immersed into the simulation is beyond me. :rolleyes:

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #16 on: May 28, 2002, 11:45:38 PM »
second Tac's nomination

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #17 on: May 28, 2002, 11:46:28 PM »
Rude?

Offline Dinger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1705
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #18 on: May 28, 2002, 11:48:19 PM »
nopoop's right.  Bug or no, you were wrong to take any chances with a perk plane.  If there's a bug in AH (and there are plenty), if there's a glitch in the internet (netstorms occur every three hours), it will hit you when you're in a perk plane.  More Perk planes are lost to connection issues and bugs than to enemy action.
Besides why would you need auto-takeoff? If you've played AH long enough to get 200 perk points, you've played long enough to set up a beer fridge by the PC. End of discussion.

Offline Shane

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8004
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #19 on: May 29, 2002, 12:30:29 AM »
i've never, ever, ever, once, had a problem with auto takeoff in anything...

must've been something else....
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline Esme

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 318
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #20 on: May 29, 2002, 12:47:37 AM »
ROTFL!  That's even funnier than the occasion of my losing my first ever perked plane, the more so because you're daft enough to be claiming to  be angry about it, Roy0fCA.

What happened to me was that after pootling aound in bombers and C47's long enough, I eventually got enough perkies to fly the Ar234 in the MA. "Wahay!", thought I "NOW try and catch me, y'Pony/N1K1/Spit-loving fighter dweebs!". Understand, I like the Ar234 because it's a thoroughly nice plane to fly, and because it's also a change from the Ju88 (hint - more LW bomber types, please! ;-) ), and because it'd be nice to be flying something in the MA where I could almost - ALMOST - guarantee my own suvival if I flew intelligently in it. It's not my plance of choice, though, I prefer prop aircraft.

Took off at base away from action. Climbed out over water, away from action to grab alt. Started heading for enemy territory, still climbing at an altitude where I'd have plenty of options if I spotted enemy.  Spotted enemy, and here my cunning strategy got let down by misjudgment and a bad decision. I certainly should have put my nose down to gain speed, and didn't. I probably should have turned a different direction than I did ("the OTHER left!").  What followed was classic...

... I got gunned down by a newly-minted Bf110.  And laughed my socks off  and congratulated my assailant about it, too.

My SECOND perk-pane loss (also an Ar234) was due to a disco.

One of the joys of flying the early jets is learning how to nurse them off the deck and up where they are most at home. I can't imagine even wanting to use autotakeoff with them. And RoyofCA, if you KNEW about the autotakeoff bug, then you KNEW you might fall foul of it if you couldn't be bothered to take off manually. I mean, c'MON, effectively no engine torque-induced swing, tricycle undercarriage and a beautiful view from the cockpit...  

....

!!!

Esme (wondering how the points to get that 262 were acquired in the first place!)

Offline aztec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1800
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #21 on: May 29, 2002, 06:04:20 AM »
Congradulations RoyofCa, you have fully established yourself as a classic squeaker&Complainer. :rolleyes:

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #22 on: May 29, 2002, 06:28:13 AM »
Not making excuses but why da hell do you use auto takeoff?
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #23 on: May 29, 2002, 07:22:08 AM »
Hmmm,...there is a right way and a wrong way to post a problem.

1) If you want the issue resolved, you provide enough detailed information so the developers can reproduce the problem.  If they cannot reproduce it, it cannot be "fixed".  This is the correct way to report a problem.

2) Ranting or complaining about something and not providing any information about the exact nature of what lead up to the so called "bug" will not get anything resolved and will possibly make the reportee look like someone who is more than happy to just complain.  This is garanteed to get pretty much ignored by any resonable developer.

My question to you RoyofCA.  Would you like a resolution to the problem or not?  If you do, then post all the information you can to the Bug forum that lead up to the "bug".  I will also tell you, there is no way you can report enough information about a "bug".  The more you have, the better.
Developers are not mind readers, nor or they standing over your shoulder watching you.  It is up to you to post any and all information in order for a developer to reproduce the error.

What you posted here is not going to get any issue you have resolved and lastly, the people that work on this project have a genuine care and concern about the quality of thier work.  If capable, you could show a modicum of respect in this regard.
It will also go a long way to getting issues resolved.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #24 on: May 29, 2002, 07:23:26 AM »
I would say this is a better troll than the C-130 nonsense. While the C-130 post had you bring John Romero in as an expert witness (a guy who has demons and plasma guns, testifying about "realism" lol).

This one evokes much more knee jerk reaction, since you attack HTC and the game. Plus, many of us have never had a problem with Auto-takeoff (except for coaxing a heavy hog off the deck). It has emotion as well as an overall lack of sense. A robust troll. While I prefer a subtler flavor, this is a refreshing chang up from the "perk that whatever" trolls.

-Sikboy
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline K West

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1445
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2002, 07:31:07 AM »
"Plus, many of us have never had a problem with Auto-takeoff "
 
 And that's the truth! Then again 80% of us fall within the optimum part of the bell curve ;)

Regardless. It takes many grains of sand to make a beach. ;)

Westy

Offline rabbit

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 96
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2002, 07:54:26 AM »
what is auto take off ?

Offline nebelwerfer

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Auto take off
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2002, 08:08:55 AM »
Hi RoyOfCA!

I have had some problems too with auto take off. And that
is because the brakes still apply when no other movement
does. And id you, by mistake, give for instance the left brake
a little touch, tha plane goes out of hand.
I've learned the hard way to take my foot of the pedals when
taking off.

Is this a feature or a bug?  ;)

/JensK

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2002, 08:22:27 AM »
Auto-take off can't killl u LOL!  RoyofCA you probably hit auto-climb straight after take-off so your plane will violently pitch down for some speed and smash into the runway.  I did this today but luckily i recovered hehehe:D
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Just when i thought HTC could not mess anything else up...
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2002, 09:11:05 AM »
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."